Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan expected to announce it will release radioactive water from crippled Fukushima nuclear plant into ocean
OregonLive ^ | 10/19/2020 | Douglas Perry

Posted on 10/19/2020 2:29:38 PM PDT by Rio

The Japanese government is planning on releasing millions of gallons of contaminated water into the ocean starting in 2022, according to international news reports.

“170 tons of new radioactive wastewater is generated each day [at Fukushima] and is stored in 1,000 specially designed tanks,” Forbes reports.

The government would begin to release the contaminated water into the ocean when the tanks being used to store it reach capacity. The final decision about whether or not to implement the plan is expected to be announced by November. The water is being treated to “reduce radioactivity,


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: donteattheshrimp; fukushima; japan; ocean; oceanrelease; radioactive; radioactivewater; seafood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Rio
Oh joy 🍣 for us sushi loving folk
21 posted on 10/19/2020 2:42:23 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Where is Grumpy Greta?

Why isn’t she violently opposing this?


22 posted on 10/19/2020 2:42:52 PM PDT by miserare ( Respect for life--life of all kinds-- is the first principle of civilization.~~A. Schweitzer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

“Oh, no-there goes Tokyo-go go godzilla!”


23 posted on 10/19/2020 2:43:38 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rio
How does that work? By diluting it in seawater?

No, they'll just add tons of lead to it.

24 posted on 10/19/2020 2:44:36 PM PDT by Nachoman (Following victory, its best to reload.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Well, you know, you live and learn.
Sometimes you die and learn.
Sometimes you live and don’t learn.
Sometimes you die stupid.


25 posted on 10/19/2020 2:44:43 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

If we were not forcing utilities to use 1960’s era technology vs the newer tech for nuclear power this would not be an issue. The basic GE design (like this one) has vulnerabilities that the newer reactors do not.

Just saying and it does not make your point invalid, it just tells the rest of the story for a technology that can be done far safer and more efficient if we would only allow it.


26 posted on 10/19/2020 2:45:20 PM PDT by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Just saw a story the other day talking about massive dies offs of Ocean life over that way.


27 posted on 10/19/2020 2:46:11 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I never noticed before...Godzilla has thighs like Hillary’s.


28 posted on 10/19/2020 2:46:30 PM PDT by miserare ( Respect for life--life of all kinds-- is the first principle of civilization.~~A. Schweitzer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

Waiting for Greta to decree that we can’t eat ocean fish anymore.


29 posted on 10/19/2020 2:48:47 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adical Islam,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

“Greta Thunberg would go nonlinear.”

What happened to her going ‘nuclear’ ?? too easy !!


30 posted on 10/19/2020 2:49:34 PM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Hiroshima and Nagasaki are liveable today.
https://gizmodo.com/why-can-people-live-in-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-now-but-1451250877


31 posted on 10/19/2020 2:49:47 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio

A banana is radioactive. The question is always “how much?”

Nuclear power remains the safest, cleanest, most reliable form of power production ever devised by mankind. Yes, it is actually safer than wind, solar, and hydro power. And vastly more reliable.

Coal fire power plants produce more radioactive waste and a lot more smog and other problems. “Green” energy power requires the use of very not-green batteries and a lot more materials covering a lot more landscape to produce the amount of power necessary. Anyone not supporting nuclear power doesn’t understand the power industry; nuclear or otherwise. I’ve yet to meet anyone who’s anti-nuclear who has an understanding of how nuclear power plants operate.


32 posted on 10/19/2020 2:50:30 PM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

Well, nuclear detonation certainly involves nonlinear phenomena.


33 posted on 10/19/2020 2:51:43 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrats' John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Texan5

BOC.

5.56mm


34 posted on 10/19/2020 2:53:45 PM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! Finish THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: miserare

Hey, that’s not fat! That’s muscle!


35 posted on 10/19/2020 2:54:36 PM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rio

There is more than 500 times as much uranium in the oceans already than there is in the ground. There are roughly 4 billion tons of uranium dissolved in the oceans. This release won’t even cause a measurable increase in radioactivity... very likely it won’t even cause an increase at all much less a measurable one. The reason is that radioactive isotopes decay so the amount in the oceans is going down all the time, and is likely going down much faster than the difference this release would make.

That being said, the vast bulk of the radioactive isotopes that will be released in this case will not be uranium but rather deuterium,
also known as heavy water. There is even more heavy water in the oceans than uranium and it has a much shorter half life, so I would not lose sleep over this release.


36 posted on 10/19/2020 2:56:20 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rio
The water is being treated to “reduce radioactivity"

Now that would be a good trick.

How long before Godzilla shows up??

37 posted on 10/19/2020 2:58:16 PM PDT by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest
A banana is radioactive. The question is always “how much?”

What about a pointed stick?

38 posted on 10/19/2020 3:00:04 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rio

Say what you will but those 4 headed sea bass are pretty tasty.


39 posted on 10/19/2020 3:02:48 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
Say what you will but those 4 headed sea bass are pretty tasty.

Are they ill-tempered?

40 posted on 10/19/2020 3:03:11 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson