Posted on 10/19/2020 11:47:59 AM PDT by armyofprinciples
And if you weren’t so f’in snarky, people would like you better.
I’ve been following this all but obsessively since Wednesday. To whom did he produce them? Do you know of a website where I can go and look at them? I agree that they’ve been talked about, I’m unaware of where they’ve been put out so people can look at them. The former is insufficient; the latter is what is required to shut down the media narrative. If I’m wrong I will cheerfully stand corrected.
Oh woe is me. Your question was snarky enough to warrant a snarky reply.
Well,... admitting that does call to question Fox's credibility.
My question wasn’t snarky at all. Perhaps you should adopt a policy of keeping your big yap shut if you can’t address a brother in the cause in a civil way, particularly since the reply which you purport to find objectionable wasn’t even directed to you.
Sure: we keep hearing that the repair contract signed by hunter and emails from his lawyer asking for return of the laptop exist. Both are solid gold authentication and that’s what I was referring to. Don’t get me wrong: I think the photos are sufficient authentication since they are plainly accurate. But we’re not trying to convince ME; we’re trying to convince low information people who are being bombarded by the media counter narrative.
Well main stream media will not cover it they are bought and paid for.
Well is anyone stupid enough to show themselves masturbating on a zoom call?
Perhaps Rudy Giuliani has at his disposal some means for verifying the credibility of the information in Hunter Biden’s laptop that Fox News does not.
Dude its been verified as legit 6 ways to Sunday!
1. He has Hunters signed permission to work on the PC
2. The shop owner has the receipt from the FBI when they subpoenaed the laptop
3. FBI and DOJ have the laptop! Why wont they deny the data?
4. Hunters lawyer just last week called the shop owner asking for the return of the laptop and hard drive.
5. Rudy already had times and dates from when he interviewed Ukranian officials under oath. Bidens emails line up?
Chris Wallace is a deep state rat protector!
Hey Fox news— this looks pretty credible!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/irLfDommvT2T/
For those who don’t want to watch-
Ukraine Prosecutor General Office holds press conference laying out how Ukraine was defrauded of 13 Billion dollars. Directly ties Joe and Hunter Biden to the fraud and lays out each step of how they did it along with the help of US embassy and State Dept officials who are named, shell companies and banks (Morgan Stanley and Franklin Templeton).
Plays taped phone calls of Joe Biden talking with ex president Poroshenko.
-within 3 minutes brings up Bidens
-within 4 minute mark mentions Joe Biden
-6 minute mark to 18 minute mark shows actual interview with the prosecutors and the disguised corruption whistle blowers- shows exactly how the Bidens laundered their money
- 18 minute mark onwards lays out the banks the money transferred through including Morgan Stanley and Franklin Templeton for Burisma and Rosemont Senaca (Hunters company). -23 minute mark literally plays Joe Biden on the phone with Poroshenko (ex Ukrainian President I think) . -40 minute mark discusses the Russian Olena Mazurova (Russian widow who gave Hunter the 3.5 million). - 50 minute mark Lays out throughout how 13 BILLION was stolen from the Ukraine people through a tariff scheme and also the fund the US sent Ukraine to “clean up” corruption which was then funneled out of the Ukraine with the help of those at the US embassy- Stephanie Holmes (head of Law enforcement section of US embassy) and Kristin Kvien (US charge of Affairs in Ukraine) and George Kent (State Dept). They have requested the money back from Mnuchin...who has said No. Facebook URL for sharing- https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=3580808228598881&id=100000092169503
Since the information you questioned is available almost anywhere on the web, even FOX if you watch the commentators and not the news casts, I figured the question was calling the facts into question rather than a genuine interest in the facts. So untork your panties and get on with the topic at hand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.