The left will say it's provenance is more important than the content, and give Biden a pass.
Even though there is no evidence, not even a claim by the data owner, that the data was the result of a hack.
No question about this provenance. It’s Joe himself.
FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor
https://youtu.be/Q0_AqpdwqK4?t=3074
Democrats are pure evil.
Provenance is paramount, except when it concerns some dirt on a conservative.
Like the provenance of Trump’s tax returns?
>> No reporting, censorship... Here’s why.
STFU, Devin
It’s good to know that if the situation had been reversed and leaked emails showed one of Donald Trump’s kids accepting bribes on his behalf from a foreign corporation, social media would be equally reluctant to publicize the story without carefully confirming all details.
/s
Tucker carlson led with this story tonight and it was thorough and he had the NY Post reporter on too.
Good chance they could find Hunter’s DNA on the lap top from him watching porn.
So, someone sat in his basement and created 40,000 bogus emails that can be crosswalked to verified events, facts, and other documents. And, where did they find the body double for the sex tape.
Complete nonsense, but this is the Democrat talking point.
I don’t recall anyone in the MSM being concerned about the “provenance” of the Steele memo, even though it quickly became obvious that it came from the Hillary campaign and the Obama administration.
4 years ago they told use don’t read Hillary’s emails, they weren’t supposed to be public and the media could be in a better position to review them.
Meanwhile someone steals Donald Trump’s tax returns and they are fair game for conspiracy theories about no taxes paid.
Well, yeah. They're directly involved in downplaying and discrediting and diverting attention from their involvement with the Biden Crime Syndicate.
“When something of this nature comes up, it pays to investigate the sources very closely:”
Unless it is printed by the Atlantic and smears PDJT
This article says nothing and offers no facts.
It’s “hard to swallow” and Russia!
But even if it’s not Russia ... something else.
Fing leftist liars. It’s not in the news because it’s Biden. Duh.
Like they did with the Steele dossier and the Russian hoax. Oh, wait…
But for three years day in and day out we heard about Trump colluding with Russia, nonstop. No evidence was required. Nothing. Not a shred.
“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.” (But only if you’re a republican.)
“When something of this nature comes up, it pays to investigate the sources very closely:”
Unless it’s against a Republican, then they’ll run full front page articles based on anonymous sources.
“It may very well be, as turned out to be the case before, that foreign intelligence services are directly involved.”
Well, if they’re talking about Russia and the CCP, they want biden to win.
unless its bad for Trump ... then you run with it.
It’s always the case with negative information about Democrats - the scandal is how or why the information was revealed - not what the information revealed. Contrast this with the stories about the recent leak of Trump’s tax returns.
This is the formula for how the press treats Democrats and Republicans with complete different standards - every single time.