Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing': report
The Hill ^ | 10 13 2020 | Olivia Beavers

Posted on 10/13/2020 5:12:08 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

The federal prosecutor Attorney General Bill Barr tapped to investigate whether Obama administration officials improperly requested the unmasking of individuals during the 2016 election has concluded his probe without “finding any substantive wrongdoing,” The Washington Post reported Tuesday.

Barr appointed U. S. Attorney Jeremy Bash to review whether there was wrongdoing by the Obama administration in requesting the identities of individuals — in particular Trump allies — whose names are redacted in intelligence reports during the heated election.

The practice, known as unmasking, is common and done to help government officials make sense of the intelligence documents they are reviewing, but the president and his allies have alleged that Obama-era officials acted improperly in making a series of unmasking requests that ultimately led to former Trump campaign aide Michael Flynn’s name to be unmasked.

According to the Post, Bash and his team reviewed unmasking practices as well as whether officials at the time improperly leaked information to reporters. Bash reportedly turned over his findings to Barr, whose office chose not to publicly release the findings. The findings did not rise to the allegations Trump and his allies have made about wrongdoing, according to the report.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agbarr; bagppes; barr; bash; benghazi; jeremybash; obama; stefanhalper; unmasking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last
To: yesthatjallen

Notice how this Hill story cites only the WaPo. If there was an identified official source, wouldn’t that be mentioned? Smells like Democrat propaganda.


21 posted on 10/13/2020 5:28:51 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Wasn’t a Durham report too political before the election, but this isn’t? This stooge couldn’t be anymore DS.


22 posted on 10/13/2020 5:28:57 PM PDT by hardspunned (MAGA, now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
How unmasking happens:

In order to learn the information, US officials with proper security clearance to review the report can ask the agency that collected it — such as the FBI, CIA or National Security Agency — to “unmask” the name.

They must provide a reason, such as their need to fully understand the significance or context behind the intelligence.

This is a common process that happens “literally hundreds of times a year across multiple administrations,” according to former CIA deputy director Michael Morell.

If the request is approved, the names are then only shared with the specific individual who asked. Leaking an “unmasked” name to the media or public is illegal.

23 posted on 10/13/2020 5:29:58 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

The way Just Us works is you narrow the scope of the investigation so that you are looking for a needle in a haystack.

Then you spend thousands of hours and lots of staff time hunting for the needle.

Then you don’t find it.

This stuff is _so_ predictable.


24 posted on 10/13/2020 5:30:03 PM PDT by cgbg (Masters don't want slaves talking about masters and slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Spit.


25 posted on 10/13/2020 5:30:06 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I’m just surprised that anyone actually bought the whole any-day-now bigtime arrests “tick-tocking” hook, line and sinker. Was a fraud from “start” (as if they ever did anything to begin with, heh) to finish.


26 posted on 10/13/2020 5:30:21 PM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Why did Barr have someone else investigate it?


27 posted on 10/13/2020 5:30:24 PM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Oh for Pete’s sake...


28 posted on 10/13/2020 5:30:26 PM PDT by Ronin (White privilege is not having to fake your own hate crimes. (HT: CrappieLuck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Unmasking isn’t illegal.

It’s what they do with the information that comes into question.


29 posted on 10/13/2020 5:31:02 PM PDT by justme4now (Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

I sat through fatty’s bag pipes and speeches for this?


30 posted on 10/13/2020 5:31:48 PM PDT by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Bash reportedly turned over his findings to Barr, whose office chose not to publicly release the findings. The findings did not rise to the allegations Trump and his allies have made about wrongdoing, according to the report.

----

"The findings did not rise to the allegations Trump and his allies have made about wrongdoing, according to the report"

NOW, just where does that come from if the report is not publicly released? Oh, yes, more confidential informants. Head shake. The article is pure crap. And AG Barr is not going to bring more damage to the FBI by further exposure than has already been discovered.

31 posted on 10/13/2020 5:33:38 PM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme4now

Unmasking isn’t illegal.

It’s what they do with the information that comes into question.

= = =

Oh, okay.

I guess that will be discovered in the NEXT investigation.

GEEEEEEZ. I’m sick of this shat.


32 posted on 10/13/2020 5:34:00 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: All


You don’t understand!

They have to wait for the exact right time - 20 years in the future.

And they can’t use the tools the Dems use, that wouldn’t be gentlemanly.

A lot of idiots should be apologizing for their gullible idiocy.



33 posted on 10/13/2020 5:34:52 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I agree my friend.


34 posted on 10/13/2020 5:36:08 PM PDT by justme4now (Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason


They said the same exact things about Barr, Mueller, and Comey.

Same people championed all of them.


35 posted on 10/13/2020 5:36:34 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Trump should have appointed his son as AG right out of the gate.


36 posted on 10/13/2020 5:39:05 PM PDT by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


Joe Biden is on Video admitting to a Felony.

They are all protecting Joe.

It’s just that Simple.


37 posted on 10/13/2020 5:39:52 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

“Even with Barr, Dems get away with it EVERY SINGLE TIME”

But Trump made the mistake of trusting life-long swamp creatures to go after fellow life-long swamp creatures.


38 posted on 10/13/2020 5:42:51 PM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

“Trump should have appointed his son as AG right out of the gate.”

No. Rudy G. and/or Jay Sekulow, to investigate and prosecute. Hopefully there is a second term where wiser appointments are made.


39 posted on 10/13/2020 5:45:42 PM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
The Swap protects its own.
 
40 posted on 10/13/2020 5:48:03 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (Guide me, O thou great redeemer, pilgrim through this barren land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson