Protecting innocent little preborn babies between conception and birth is a good thing.
Everyone who is for protecting innocent little preborn babies between conception and birth must say so loudly and proudly.
That includes Supreme Court Justices.
Protecting babies is the foundation of civilization.
And so CNN..............?
Are we supposed to believe that this means Judge Barrett was attempting to conceal the fact that she is prolife? What garbage!
I believe firmly in retroactive abortion, and I say we start with the left.
How many talks did she disclose? She forgot two? Oh the horror!
oh my, they’ve really got her now- Hey CNN- Say hello to the new SC judge Amy-
“ CNN acts like Amy Coney Barrett being pro-life is a bad thing, and that each revelation about her pro-life activities is negative.
Protecting innocent little preborn babies between conception and birth is a good thing.”
Depends on who’s in charge.
So were are not supposed to even have discussions on the murder of the unborn?
So CNN, is this all you have? Tough schiff. Elections have consequences.
Good. I hope the coming Democrat inquisition serves to radicalize her.
mmhmm - just like Ginsburg failed to disclose she worked for the ACLU.
That jerk is vile.
I took a kid who was the product of a rape under my wing about 3 years ago.
He’s a freaking handful.
To say the least :)
Puerto Rican kid from brooklyn and he’s 18 and so far no arrests since we met.
He acts like a gangsta but he’s not and he doesn’t commit crimes.
But his future is still 50/50 on what it will be.
Brought up in a BRUTAL life but not very appreciative of the fact that I love him.
A schemer he is :) And a bad temper. And always trying to make a quick buck with legal scams :)
Very much like me when I was young :)
He was doing Very Well in Jobcorps away from his lousy neighborhood and then they shut it down because of this horrible virus
who knows if he will go back?
i HATE cuomo..this one’s on him as the jobcorps site was upstate
sorry for making this so long
-PJ
She should simply reply to any of these “gotcha” questions about her faith, “Article VI, Clause 3: no religious test.” Just repeat the same answer, over and over.
And because of this I think an appropriate remedy is to skip the committee hearing, note in the record, and move to a floor vote on Monday.
Oh my god, she is anti-abortion? How long have they been sitting on this information?
Forget the inquisition. Just vote on it.
She must have contracted the Comey-Clinton, “i can’t recall” bug.
What!! You mean to say that Professor Barrett failed to list a talk she gave to students while she was an instructor at Notre Dame University? Oh, the horror of it all. She should be investigated by the FBI, the UN, and maybe even Interpol!
Ah, so the excused for the rhino members of Pansy Graham’s committee are now in the public media. The Republicants will do their usual, cave to the left.