Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Dept. Eases Election Fraud Inquiry Constraints as Trump Promotes False Narrative
NY Times ^ | OCTOBER 7, 2020 | Michael S. Schmidt and Katie Benner

Posted on 10/07/2020 5:39:22 PM PDT by be-baw

For decades, federal prosecutors have been told not to mount election fraud investigations in the final months before an election for fear they could depress voter turnout or erode confidence in the results. Now, the Justice Department has lifted that prohibition weeks before the presidential election.

The move comes as President Trump and Attorney General William P. Barr have promoted a false narrative that voter fraud is rampant, potentially undermining Americans’ faith in the election.

A Justice Department lawyer in Washington said in a memo to prosecutors on Friday that they could investigate suspicions of election fraud before votes are tabulated. That reversed a decades-long policy that largely forbade aggressively conducting such inquiries during campaigns to keep their existence from becoming public and possibly “chilling legitimate voting and campaign activities” or “interjecting the investigation itself as an issue” for voters.

The memo creates “an exception to the general non-interference with elections policy” for suspicions of election fraud, particularly misconduct by federal government workers, including postal workers or military employees; both groups transport mail-in ballots. The exception allows investigators to take overt investigative steps, like questioning witnesses, that were previously off limits in such inquiries until after election results were certified.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2020election; concerntroll; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; doomed; election2020; katiebenner; landslide; michaelsschmidt; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; teotwawki; trumplandslide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
I just subscribed for free to NY Times. I just had to log in to my google account to make it happen. I don't know if this will come back to haunt me or not. As far as I can tell I just had to agree to there sending me spam.
1 posted on 10/07/2020 5:39:22 PM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Virtual fish wrap.


2 posted on 10/07/2020 5:40:49 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Must be over the target...


3 posted on 10/07/2020 5:41:22 PM PDT by JoeRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw


4 posted on 10/07/2020 5:41:48 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
That reversed a decades-long policy that largely forbade aggressively conducting such inquiries during campaigns

Because the yellow-backed GOPee scumbags didn't want to rock their cashcow guaranteed paycheck boat.

Sorry, GOPee boys and girls - Trump has exposed your little act - the pretend "opposition" party who are just there for the paycheck.

Eff you scumbags.

5 posted on 10/07/2020 5:44:10 PM PDT by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

The Slimes is a fake narrative.


6 posted on 10/07/2020 5:44:38 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

NYT doesn’t know about the ballots in ditch or more than one ballot per dem? Or maybe they didn’t hear about all the dead people voting. Ballots found in dumpsters-NYT is spreading a false narrative.


7 posted on 10/07/2020 5:46:27 PM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

The prospect that the Justice Department might investigate crimes is very distressing to the NYT.


8 posted on 10/07/2020 5:47:17 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Can we blame the masses for their hate when we have the msm and press lying 24/7? They are Equally responsible for the state of affairs.


9 posted on 10/07/2020 5:47:30 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Condolences.

Why would you do that?


10 posted on 10/07/2020 5:47:54 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
promoted a false narrative that voter fraud is rampant

Out and Out LIE, we have Vote fraud since the Democrat Party was created
11 posted on 10/07/2020 5:47:58 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Spam they will, and you can post the juicier spams here. Someone had to take one for the team, I guess.


12 posted on 10/07/2020 5:49:33 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (JOBS NOT MOBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

And many people in positions of power.


13 posted on 10/07/2020 5:51:08 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (JOBS NOT MOBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Lock all of the NYT peeps up.


14 posted on 10/07/2020 5:51:27 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

But right wing extremists are a HUGE problem.

Yeah right...


15 posted on 10/07/2020 5:52:08 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Rethugicans need to investigate every single address versus the census then go from there. There must be some way to check if 8 people voted from the same address, then check if any of them live there


16 posted on 10/07/2020 5:54:18 PM PDT by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
My wife signed up for a free subscription to the Wall Street Journal about three years ago. Six months free. After the "free" period ran out... we still get it. Every morning, thrown in our driveway. My wife and I have called the WSJ many times asking them to stop it, and we still get it. Every day someone has to go out, pick the stupid thing up, pull it out of its plastic bag, and put the two separately into the recycle bin. The recycling people won't take the paper if it is wrapped in a plastic bag, they two have to be separated. Every damn day. Pick it up off the driveway, separate useless newspaper from plastic bag, and put both in the garbage.

I'm sure we're counted as a "subscriber" for the WSJ's stupid advertisers.

17 posted on 10/07/2020 5:54:34 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrats' John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fedora

If there is no problem, then certainly an investigation would prove that hmmm? You can’t simply make it up? So hmmm, why would the NYT and other liberals have a problem with investigating aggressively the potential for voter fraud?


18 posted on 10/07/2020 5:54:42 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
"the pretend "opposition" party" --- Thats a good way to say it.
19 posted on 10/07/2020 5:55:05 PM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

The Nazi Times


20 posted on 10/07/2020 5:56:46 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson