To: knighthawk
To: knighthawk
“...There is no There is no precedent in our nations history for the Senate holding a confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court nominee this close, just 27 days, before a presidential election in our nations history for the Senate holding a confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court nominee this close, just 27 days, before a presidential election...”
Does there have to be a “precedent” before you do anything in the Senate????
Of course not..............
3 posted on
10/07/2020 2:38:34 PM PDT by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC.....Patriotically Correct)
To: knighthawk
Well, if shes qualified, confirm her.. today.
4 posted on
10/07/2020 2:39:12 PM PDT by
ScottinVA
(First, letÂ’s deal with the election; then weÂ’ll deal with BLM.)
To: knighthawk
A-hole doesn’t know his own job description nor the President’s discretion.
5 posted on
10/07/2020 2:48:03 PM PDT by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: knighthawk
Mr. Coons....4 years is 4 years. It's THIS President's right to nominate.
I wonder how long she was "on machines" before they pulled the plug.
To: knighthawk
She’d better not vacation at Cibolo Creek Ranch, TX.
8 posted on
10/07/2020 3:00:38 PM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
To: knighthawk
This bozo does not know his history. I read earlier today that one Supreme Court justice was confirmed AFTER the election. Do not remember the details.
To: knighthawk
Coons has a damaged logic and reasoning center in his apparently small brain.
10 posted on
10/07/2020 3:05:04 PM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
To: knighthawk
11 posted on
10/07/2020 3:12:05 PM PDT by
funfan
To: knighthawk
It seems to me that Coons is sending out a strong signal to his fellow Democrats here:
Attacking ACB will be politically costly. We must attack the nomination and confirmation process instead.
12 posted on
10/07/2020 3:14:47 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
To: knighthawk
There is no precedent in our nations history for the Senate holding a confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court nominee this close, just 27 days, before a presidential election where people are already voting in more than half the states. Someone has not read their history books or is flat out lying.
There are 27 precedents. Some as late as the incumbent sending in his SCOTUS nomination AFTER the election, before the new president was sworn in.
To: knighthawk
Coons, a/k/a the Delaware Cueball, won his Senate seat after waging a campaign in which he and his supporters insinuated that an wonderful Catholic woman, Christine O’Donnell, was a witch.
He is a complete and unmitigated piece of dung.
16 posted on
10/07/2020 3:26:13 PM PDT by
nd76
To: knighthawk
There is no precedent in our nations history for the Senate holding a confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court nominee this close, just 27 days, before a presidential election How about the precedent for running dementia candidates?
To: knighthawk
So says the scumbag who stood by while pedo joe sniffed and molested his daughter.
To: knighthawk
There is no precedent in our nations history for the Senate holding a confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court nominee this close, just 27 days, before a presidential election where people are already voting in more than half the states.And here I was thinking Democrats were all about setting precedents.
Besides, it will be historical! Who doesn't want to be part of an important historical event?
Coons? He's part of history now whether he likes it or not.
23 posted on
10/07/2020 4:22:37 PM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson