Posted on 10/06/2020 12:06:49 PM PDT by knighthawk
Over 2,000 voters in Los Angeles County received “faulty” ballots which lacked a section to vote for the President of the United States, the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk’s office confirmed on Monday.
According to the Los Angeles Times, roughly 2,100 voters received the flawed ballots, missing the section to cast a vote for the office of the presidency. The outlet reported that the ballots were primarily confined to those in the Woodland Hills area.
“I’ve always been an in-person voter, so I wasn’t even planning on looking at the ballot until the day I was going to vote,” Woodland Hills resident Christy Gargalis said, explaining that she compared her ballot to her husband’s and sister’s ballots — both of which were missing the section to vote for the president as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
A ‘glitch’.........................
Maybe Trump has a shot at California after all.
Not cool but CA is not going red for Trump.
bttt
California is becoming an object lesson on doing the “Philosopher’s Stone” in reverse, taking gold and turning it into lead! Good government into idiot government. I still remember the spectacular visuals but I’m not sure that I’d even want to visit anymore!
Their vote has been prerecorded for their convenience.
Nah, it's a feature. Mark your ballot, send it in. The county will fill in the presidential vote for you, in Biden's name.
Since some states have decided to give their electors to the popular vote winner, this could still has an impact, by reducing Trump votes.
They can’t lose California if no one gets to vote for President ? LOL
Notice how the “glitches” are always in favor of the loser Progressives at the expense of conservatives.
lol!
******************
An even smarter idea is mailing people accurate ballots.
I do not believe this interstate (where electoral votes go to popular vote winner) compact is in effect yet. There is a threshold number of states who have to agree, and there are not yet enough states who have agreed to this. If and when the compact takes effect, there will be challenges to this as the electors are elected to this federal office, just as Senators are. I doubt it is constitutional to award a federal office to the the clear loser of a federal election, and I suspect this issue will go before the Supreme Court.
“I do not believe this interstate (where electoral votes go to popular vote winner) compact is in effect yet. “
It isn’t. In Colorado, we have to vote on it at the 2020 election. I hope Trump gets the popular vote and Colorado votes for it!
No worries... they already cast your vote for you.
“Now, contract trace who was the super spreader.....whether by person, or by placing a viral load in his proximity.”
Nope. That hasn’t happened yet, and it was blue states planning to do this, anyway.
Sorry, pasting error, heh heh.
“Since some states have decided to give their electors to the popular vote winner, this could still has an impact, by reducing Trump votes.”
Nope. That hasn’t happened yet, and it was blue states planning to do this, anyway.
Notice how the “glitches” are always in favor of the loser Progressives at the expense of conservatives.
How do you figure that this glitch favors progressives?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.