Posted on 09/29/2020 7:32:37 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
Bodycam video shows unarmed, and calm Brad Parscale tackled, arrested Released an hour ago by Fort Lauderdale police.
He has no gun, offered no resistance and was very calm. By contrast, the politically motivated police proceed to launch a flying leap at him, wrestle him to the ground and roughly manhandle him for no reason. I want to know who is in charge of the police in that county, who the DA is, what their politic affiliations are, what their connections to Soros and the Dems is etc.
(Excerpt) Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...
US military aren’t deployed against us. And don’t see us as the enemy. And actually I know soldiers who’ve done duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. Do you know the first thing that happens when they shoot a civilian? They are taken into custody for an immediate investigation, the entire procedure comes from a presumption of wrong doing, and there’s no-union to back them.
If you think your doctor sucks you can get another. Can’t get a different cop if you think the one at your house is wound too tight.
We have a right to due process in this country and a presumption of innocence. Our laws our built to say NOBODY deserves it until they’ve gotten a trial.
We are defending him BECAUSE there were no bruises on his wife AND Pascal is a genius NEEDED by the Trump campaign taking him out hurts Trump campaign! Soros is scum and up to his eyeballs in everything he has plenty of money to make things happen!!
/sarc
Didn’t say all cops are bad. Actually I said the opposite. I said you can’t TRUST a cop until after the encounter the and it turns out you didn’t get shot. So now you’ve gone to LYING.
Unarmed people peacefully talking to an officer should not be tackled to the ground. This isn’t about defending him, it’s about defending all of us.
Yes.
Remember back in April May June when the cops kept brutalizing law abiding citizens merely for taking a walk at the park, not wearing masks and breaking quarantines, and were totally blase about it, including manhandling old women and children?
That was before the massive riots and anarchy. Now they find themselves under constant attack from BLM/ANTIFA terrorists and who are they turning to for support? The same law abiding citizens they terrorized before.
Five. of 750?
“Why are some here defending this guy? Not everything is a soros conspiracy plot. Knuckleheads.”
Some here are anti-police.
Pretty much. People are forgetting he is still in charge of the online part of Trump's campaign. And we already had almost everyone who has worked at the top level in Trump's campaigns has being taken down by the deep state on trumped up charges.
You gave examples. I gave examples. The facts are on the table. Cops kill too many people in this country. Often under extremely questionable circumstances. The scary part if you dig into those you’ll see the only one to actually get into trouble was the one that didn’t kill their victim.
Are you comfortable in a world where a cop can demand you crawl on the floor in your underwear while you are obviously unarmed and kill you, and get found innocent?
That’s the basic problem I’m talking about. No consequences for murder because “thin blue line”.
The wife’s actions were very suspicious.
“You gave examples. I gave examples.”
My example shows that your use of the 750 number is misleading.
No it didn’t. Because it wasn’t misleading. Way to ignore the rest of my post. Typical.
Dems.
Oh, bull crap. Some whack-job walks into a church and starts shooting people, as has happened recently, and you would apparently suggest that a cop should attempt to disarm the shooter (maybe use his notebook as a frisbee, to knock the gun out if his hand ;^), rather than deprive the shooter of a trial.
How about if one of the civilians in the church shoots the gunman - should he be charged with a crime, for depriving Mr. Whack Job of his constitutionally mandated legal proceedings? What if the civilian is a plumber, with a CCW - would that make all plumbers a "clear and present danger"? Or are you simply suggesting that gun owners represent a "clear and present danger"?
;^)
Guess you missed the last line of my post ("/sarc")...
;^)
“No it didnt. Because it wasnt misleading. Way to ignore the rest of my post. Typical.”
Looking at the rest indicates 750 is just the. tip of the iceberg!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.