Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's military might, aggressive policies spur talks of creating 'Asian NATO'
https://www.washingtontimes.com ^ | SEPTEMBER 27, 2020 | GUY TAYLOR

Posted on 09/28/2020 9:55:11 PM PDT by RomanSoldier19

China’s growing military prowess and increasingly aggressive foreign policy have revived talk among U.S. and European officials of creating an “Asian NATO” of regional powers to contain communist Beijing’s expansionist ambitions.

Past efforts for an East Asian security alliance, such as the post-World War II Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) to guard against Cold War-era communism, failed to gain lasting traction.

But that was before China’s emergence as a rising superpower — a reality NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said is “fundamentally shifting the global balance of power” in ways should motivate NATO itself to “become more global.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asianato; ccp; china; kag; maga; nato; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

A

1 posted on 09/28/2020 9:55:11 PM PDT by RomanSoldier19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

This needs to be led by India, Japan, and the Muzzies like Indonesia/Malaysia.

The US should assist but unlike NATO the primary responsibility should be on the nearby nations. If they don’t want to defend themselves, they don’t deserve to be free.


2 posted on 09/28/2020 10:00:10 PM PDT by Fai Mao (There is no justice until The PIAPS is legally executed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao
If they don’t want to defend themselves, they don’t deserve to be free.

"Free" in this context means free from Chinese domination? Because none of those nations are anywhere near "free" as we Freepers understand the term.

3 posted on 09/28/2020 10:05:57 PM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

https://www.usdebtclock.org


4 posted on 09/28/2020 10:14:12 PM PDT by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

[”Free” in this context means free from Chinese domination? Because none of those nations are anywhere near “free” as we Freepers understand the term. ]


None of the WWII Allies was “free” as we understand the term. Heck, none of the other NATO allies today is free as we understand the term. Hate crime prosecution and prison in the UK if you get up in a Muslim’s face and utter a few choice words, but not vice versa? Something similar in much of the EU outside of the Visegrad states? The issue isn’t *freedom* in the abstract - it’s preventing China from adding its neighbors’ assets and population to its ledger.

In other words, the same reason we got involved in WWII - to prevent the Axis Powers from becoming powerful enough through adding manpower and resources to become irresistible. China is already bigger than the US in geographical extent and 5x in manpower terms. We don’t need it getting any bigger.


5 posted on 09/28/2020 10:23:07 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

“free from Chinese domination?”

Yes, exactly. Free from Chinese domination. I would say Japan and South Korea are relatively free places, India, by comparison to the PRC is a free place, Malaysia is, it seems to me, better than Indonesia but neither is a place I want to be.

But, especially because they are not “free” as we understand it, is why they need to protect themselves rather than having the US prop up their systems.


6 posted on 09/28/2020 10:28:24 PM PDT by Fai Mao (There is no justice until The PIAPS is legally executed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Japan, alone, could arguably checkmate China just by acquiring nukes......


7 posted on 09/28/2020 10:32:46 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

No more NATOs.

We have one too many already.


8 posted on 09/28/2020 10:34:25 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner


9 posted on 09/28/2020 10:52:42 PM PDT by RomanSoldier19 (Game over, man! Game over! ; : rem ad triarios redisse is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

[Yes, exactly. Free from Chinese domination. I would say Japan and South Korea are relatively free places, India, by comparison to the PRC is a free place, Malaysia is, it seems to me, better than Indonesia but neither is a place I want to be.

But, especially because they are not “free” as we understand it, is why they need to protect themselves rather than having the US prop up their systems.]


Or we could simply let the whole region fall to the Chinese and have to deal with a behemoth incorporating 4x our surface area and 15x our population.


10 posted on 09/28/2020 10:54:57 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

Japan and SK would have to be the military core along with Australia. Add in the ASEAN nations and India. But other than opposing Chinese hegemony, what do these countries have in common? Are they really going to step up if China invades a member state? Or are they going to cry for Uncle Sam to come expend our blood and treasure?


11 posted on 09/28/2020 11:58:10 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

It’s not a bad idea.

You can’t call it NATO of course.

And ATO sounds too much like NATO.

ASTO where both AS and stand for Asian?
SCOT Stop China Organization Treaty (or stop communists)
SCAT Stop China Asian Treaty.
OTAC Organization Treaty of Asian Countries
APT Asian Protection Treaty
PACT Protection of Asian Countries Treaty


12 posted on 09/29/2020 12:42:18 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Just call it The Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere.


13 posted on 09/29/2020 12:50:24 AM PDT by Monterrosa-24 ( ...even more American than a Russian AK-47 and a French bikini.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ETCM

[But other than opposing Chinese hegemony, what do these countries have in common?]


A lot more than NATO, whose members had literally killed each other to the tune of tens of millions of people over the course of a thousand years. NATO was an attempt to paper over all of these long-held hatreds to create and maintain a speed bump that would slow down the Red Army long enough for the cavalry to arrive across the Atlantic.


14 posted on 09/29/2020 1:16:34 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Think the organization would need to be PTO vs NATO -

Just throwing it out there...


15 posted on 09/29/2020 1:37:04 AM PDT by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

That is what I thought. What is this? Another paper tiger excuse?

All that was needed to put China to heel was to loan/deploy some Pershings on Taiwan or South Korea, no need of a fracking bureaucracy


16 posted on 09/29/2020 2:26:05 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security in hates:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

China and North Korea are the only nations that Asian nations need to be protected from. China and North Korea have nuclear weapons and North Korea threatens to use them.

No nation in its right mind should join with China in a territorial pact, especially when China likes to invade neighboring countries.


17 posted on 09/29/2020 3:24:42 AM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

“Just call it The Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere.”

Priceless - just as the EU dominated by Germany gave them what they couldn’t achieve in two world wars: Rule of the European continent. England never changed its currency or dropped the Commonwealth/Anglosphere because they understood they’d always be overshadowed by Germany on the continent itself. Now a few parts of the UK (Scotland, Northern Ireland) seem to be showing a preference for German rule by remaining in the EU after Brexit...


18 posted on 09/29/2020 4:52:51 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19
in ways should motivate NATO itself to “become more global.”

What could possibly go wrong?

19 posted on 09/29/2020 4:54:13 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

The have a pact, and it should be expanded - ASEAN.

ASEAN should invite Australia, Japan and South Korea to join it and it should add a military secretariat within it, tasked with coordinating military defense plans.


20 posted on 09/29/2020 7:25:21 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson