Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lodi90

No, she is far worse from the indications. Recusing herself if a correct legal opinion would differ from what Pope Francis says?

Endorsing the lockdown and the Jacobson forced vaccination decision?

No, thanks. Bad rulings in just one year of judicial experience. If we and Trump haven’t figured out that the current Federalist Society powers that be are working against actual constitutionalism on the court, that’s on us and Trump.


54 posted on 09/26/2020 7:45:26 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

President Trump has figure out politics just fine. You don’t seem to realize there is no magic Constitutionalist candidate here to chose. Barrett is as good as we are going to get out of the corrupt United States Senate.


56 posted on 09/26/2020 7:50:59 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker
Why lie?

Barrett has never ruled on the lock downs. She ruled (along with 2 other judges, one of them also a Trump appointee) that an exception to the 50 person rule for religious gathering was constitutional. Do you have a problem with that ruling?

58 posted on 09/26/2020 7:51:54 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker
Recusing herself if a correct legal opinion would differ from what Pope Francis says?

Another lie

Amy Barrett testified under oath that she can not imagine any scenario in with she would recluse herself.

60 posted on 09/26/2020 7:54:13 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson