Barrett has never ruled on the lock downs. She ruled (along with 2 other judges, one of them also a Trump appointee) that an exception to the 50 person rule for religious gathering was constitutional. Do you have a problem with that ruling?
I am not a lawyer and can see a case for that.
But she did embrace Jacobson and egads, said she’d recuse herself if a correct decision conflicted what Pope Francis says. Lockdowns do fit with that worldview.
I also haven’t read what she wrote in that ruling. Have you?