P
Whatever.
To quote John Wayne, “That’ll be the day.”
Congressional Democrats are investigating whether the investigator investigating Clinton political influence is politically influenced.
after all these years.....right....wink wink nod nod...
Nothing ever happens - I’ll believe it when I see it.
I’m so relieved.
Could they really try to give up the Clintons so the Obamas and their collaborators go free? Bill was already impeached, so the DNC brand would not really lose much there. And the administrative state could just ‘rock on.’ Bleh!
Stop yanking my chain.
“...long thought to be a corrupt slush fund for Hillary and Bill”
Throw Chelsea in there too. She is in on it as well, to the tune of 1 million every year. The entire family is corrupt to the core.
Investigating? Really? Guess they have to spend sone of that budget money on an investigation of an untouchable. Our government agencies are an utter joke.
Beaver: “Golly gee Wally, no one seems excited by this potentially bombshell news article.”
Wally: “You gotta understand Beav, people are tired of being hosed by the media and think, “Oh jeez, not this shiet again.””
I only care if the give The PIAPS and her husband an immortality drug so that a life sentence is meaningful.
The answer to the question (or investigation) is:
Are the allegations about democrats? Are Bill and Hillary democrats?
Well then...
Investigation goes nowhere, and the investigation is just a partisan hit-job.
It’s about time. Hitlery has been stashing money illegally for years. All the money raised for Haitian Relief? Not a dollar went to Haiti.
Etc.
Etc.
Etc.
If you believe this you may want to buy a bridge in Brooklyn.
Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev greets former
president Clinton in Almaty on September 6, 2005.
CIRCA 2015 A Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times reporter claims that former President Bill Clinton falsely denied hosting a meeting with Kazakh officials when she tried to write a story that involved his foundation several years ago.
Jo Becker, who works on the newspaper's investigative desk, said Clinton only confirmed the meeting took place after she informed him there were photographs.
Clinton's role in a deal that involved Kazakhstan, the Russian government, and a man who donated millions to the president's charitable foundation were detailed in a story Becker published on Thursday.
That article revisited some of her earlier reporting and included information from the upcoming book "Clinton Cash," which is generating widespread headlines amid a flurry of reports suggesting it will raise serious questions about Clinton's family foundation.
The donor in question is Canadian mining executive Frank Giustra, a longtime friend of the former president who has given tens of millions to the Clinton Foundation in the past few years. (A couple of hours after the NYT story was published, Giustra issued a defiant statement. We've included that below.)
Becker initially wrote about the February 2007 meeting between Clinton, Giustra, and executives from the state-owned nuclear company Kazatomprom in 2008. The gathering took place at Clinton's home in Chappaqua, New York.
"When I first contacted both the Clinton foundation Mr. Clinton's spokesman and Mr. Giustra, they denied any such meeting ever took place," Becker recalled in footage aired by Fox News on Thursday.
However, Becker said Clinton and Giustra both changed their stories after she confronted them with evidence to the contrary.
"And then when we told them, 'Well we already talked to the head of Kazatomprom, who not only told us all about the meeting, but actually has a picture of him and Bill at the home in Chappaqua, and that he proudly displayed on his office wall.' They then acknowledged that yes, the meeting had taken place," Becker continued in the television interview.
The purpose of the meeting, then Kazatomprom President Moukhtar Dzhakishev told The Times, was to discuss Kazakhstan potentially buying a 10% stake in Westinghouse, a US nuclear company. Becker's 2008 story also noted one of Giustra's companies secured a deal to buy uranium deposits from Kazatomprom in 2005.
That agreement was made after Clinton accompanied Giustra on a trip to Kazakhstan. During the trip, Giustra and Clinton met with Kazakhstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev.
Clinton issued a public statement praising the Kazakh leader despite his questionable, antidemocratic record. The Times called the praise a "propaganda coup" for Nazarbayev. (he later "won relection" w/ an unbelievable 90% of the vote)
"Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton's charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustras more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clintons inner circle," wrote Becker and another reporter, Don Van Natta.
A spokesperson for the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership told Business Insider they are "working on a formal statement" in response to a request for comment on Thursday. Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership is an initiative of the Clinton Foundation that was cofounded by Clinton and Giustra in 2007. A Clinton Foundation spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
http://www.businessinsider.com/nyt-reporter-clinton-lied-about-meeting-2015-48/25
===============================
Thoughtful Americans are asking: we know the Clintons got a $145 million bribe payable to the Clinton Foundation, but how much did Russia actually pay the US for the uranium?
Anybody ever see a figure on that?
What happened to the cash for the actual uranium sale? Did that money go into OFA--Obamas slush fund for revolution? Or maybe into some offshore accounts?......
Particularly interesting is that immediately after exiting the white House, the Obama's traveled far and wide in such a short time -- their itinerary included Indonesia, Bali, French Polynesia; all those out-of-the-way places w/ infamous offshore banks that have numbered accounts.
THIS WE KNOW: the conniving Clintons took uranium.....a national strategic US asset......and sold it for their personal gain.
That smells like the infamous Teapot Dome scandal. Law professor Jonathan Turley said the Clintons uranium scheme .... "could be criminal." Turley (or somebody) needs to address the Clinton criminality in this context.