Posted on 09/16/2020 6:22:58 AM PDT by artichokegrower
Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history. This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly.
The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science. The most devastating example is his dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives by the middle of September.
(Excerpt) Read more at scientificamerican.com ...
Academia is left leaning? Who would have known.
I see LOTS Of subscription cancellations in their near future.
Leftists who run companies, magazines, etc. cannot help themselves when it comes to this kind of thing - even if it hurts them and others who depend on them for their livelihood.
There is no god but Science, and Anthony Fauci is its prophet.
“Scientific” American pitching in on the virus hoax.
“The most devastating example is his dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives by the middle of September.”
The implication of the text is that 190,000 fewer, i.e. zero, would have died, except for his “inept response”. But, this is obviously a lie, as no response would have attained zero deaths.
Kamala, they’ve been political for a long time.
Used to pick up Sci Am at the airport for infrequent flights until the 1990’s, when all they seemed to care about was whatever BJ Clinton alleged to care about.
SA has been hogwash for a long, long time.
To be fair, Scientific American hadn’t much credibility left. Seems they just jettisoned even that.
Could they get any further along the woke spectrum? Maybe they should add a trans porn section.
Scientific American is owned by the same people who own the LA times.
All you need to know.
SA was once a great scientific magazine. No more. PC has taken over. It went political during the previous election because it thought that Trump was anti-science and was going to cut funding.
It is no longer a serious scientific magazine. Every article has a PC slant. A waste of paper.
When science becomes political it is no longer science...
Here’s the CEO of the company that owns SA
He knows all the right woke jargon, that’s for certain.
Such a travesty what Leftists have done to science. We may never get it back in our lifetime.
He must have the Cosmo and Hustler endorsements locked-up.
Of course. They have to endorse the guy who says there are “at least three” genders.
Trump is ant solar?
Trump Administration Approves $1B Gemini Solar Project in Nevada Desert
https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/largest-u.s-solar-project-gets-final-nod-of-approval
Biden was making ad hominem attacks against Donald Trump on the day that he instituted travel restrictions. The “fact checking” has labeled Trump’s tweets that Biden called him Xenophobic for the teavel restrictions as mostly false because it was an ad hominem attack against Trump that did not mention Trump’s policy.
Ad hominem attacks are an illegitimate form of argumentation because they are without substance and they fail to address issues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.