It isn’t illegal. There is no over sexual behavior, and by that I mean actual sex acts, as far as I know.
It is, however, extremely distasteful and abhorrent.
***********************************************************************************
It likely is illegal-or at least would be according to 1986 Court case. It doesn’t have to show sex acts to be Child Porn.
This movie is obviously an attempt to normalize child porn and is PEDO bait. It should be destroyed, and some people should be put into jail.
********************************
Here’s the legal criteria known as the Dost Test set in the 1986 court case-not all factors have to be met:
Whether the focal point of the visual depiction is on the child’s genitalia or pubic area.
Whether the setting of the visual depiction is sexually suggestive, i.e., in a place or pose generally associated with sexual activity.
Whether the child is depicted in an unnatural pose, or in inappropriate attire, considering the age of the child.
Whether the child is fully or partially clothed, or nude.
Whether the visual depiction suggests sexual coyness or a willingness to engage in sexual activity.
Whether the visual depiction is intended or designed to elicit a sexual response in the viewer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dost_test
NUDITY IS NOT NECESSARY PER US v Knox:
https://www.mit.edu/activities/safe/safe/cases/knox/94a0734p.htm
******************************
Just a couple of the court cases. Cruz is a lawyer and is correct in his assessment. And this guy saying it’s ok is extremely suspect for trying to justify that trash.
Dost ping