Posted on 08/28/2020 10:15:46 AM PDT by BlueHorseShoe
1/11 THREAD...
https://twitter.com/gregrubini/status/1299325921233645570?s=21
1. BIG NEWS: is Joe Pientka now a Cooperating Witness for John Durham? [THREAD under development]
I think he is. Comey, McCabe & Strzok in BIG trouble.
please Retweet, and follow the THREAD while I'm writing it
Thank you, Catherine Herridge!
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
“Yeah, rocket scientist, the mainstream media hangs on my every word and then reprints What I say each night.
Youve got some serious mental issues boy.
And you guys wonder why the rest of us think you are unstable.”
I would stop now if I were you. I’m starting to get embarrassed for you.
“confirms that Joe Pientka has been cooperating with Durham, all along”
That makes sense. A couple of talking heads have been stressing the fact that Pientka needs to be questioned. Sounds like that might’ve been happening for a while now. Very good!
I disagree with you so I must be crazy. Is that it? That conspiracy theory is ACTUALLY crazy.
The Qult has probably driven more interesting people from the site over the last two years than any other single reason.
You keep telling that lie in an obvious attempt to manipulate the powers that be to purge any and all Q conversation from the site.
Give me names, facts, and statistics on these so-called people driven from the site.
Lacking that, its just another of your weird conspiracy theories and manipulations.
Enabling the q anon has serious damaged the FR brand. Over time it will get better of course.
Believe it or not, just the opposite. The Qanon movement now represents millions of people across the globe, with that number growing daily the more the media, Senatrs, and Presidents talk about it.
As one of the dwindling pieces of the internet to tolerate discussion of the movement, FR grows in stature and importance. People with your opinion exist on the left and in deep state enclaves, which can be proven by their all out assault on the movement we are seeing now.
You are one of those people.
Over time, you will come to realize how wrong you have been, if you're not just lying and already know your wrong and are a hired hand for the derps, which I suspect you are.
I am proven right more and more every day. And you know this.
Yup. He works way too hard. And fanatically so.
There's a crew of these derps embedded here.
I am proven right more and more every day.
Hmmmm. Somehow I dont think you will get much agreement on that point on this site.
What you are witnessing is Puker constructing "the big lie". This is how he operates.
First he makes the false allegation, he has it explained to him in detail why he is wrong to say that, the posted evidence is on the thread, and yet he repeats the lie.
He will now go from thread to thread telling people that Q said August 31 everybody will be arrested. When they are not, then Q has been debunked.
That's been the playbook for three years now.
Blue Horseshow theorized that there would be indictments on August 31. He also denied he had anything to do with Q.
Bagster said that the date for action has been pre-determined for three years or so now and did not give a date.
From that, Puker the mad says that Bagster said August 31.
These are the workings of a derp state embed.
Amirite, Puker?
Yea, pretty much. Or as much as Military Intelligence/NSA can know.
You're on the right track, Puker.
Finally.
You flatter yourself, Puker.
You're not smart enough to come up with these talking points yourself. Yet they are the exact same talking points the derp media uses.
Explain that.
I hope you were directing that specific post to OkieDoker and not me.
I never profess to know this stuff. Im a consumer of information and a critical thinker.
Let me repeat for anyone who may misread or misunderstand by my being lumped into a comment about Q...
I DO NOT SUPPORT Q! I am not a Q follower. At all!
Ok. Thanks for listening.
I normally ignore the babble going on.. But when the FOS is posted for the umpteen time you are called out...
Hugs and Kisses...
Said two of the biggest mental patients on FR.
*shows Mickety a photo of a missile launch*
Dr Bagster: Tell me what you see, Mickety.
Patient Mickety: A helicopter.
: )
#Ironical
Whoa. I am not the one who professed August 31 indictments. That was another poster.
And PS... Im a woman. Shhhhh
The rest of us? I guess you think people like you.
What, the rest of you at ShareBlue?
The lion does not concern himself with the opinion of the lamb.
Somehow you think you speak for the majority of Freepers. I think you may be surprised. But you don't really believe that. Its just another lie you like to tell.
I know about you.
p.s. I thought you learned your lesson about arguing with me a long time ago. What brought you out of your shell?
The tick tock getting a bit louder is it?
Nothing can stop it, you know. What is coming.
lol
Haha, we get it.
Still, despite that, you're doing pretty damn good.
What's FOS, precious?
Ahh, even better. You just jumped up a notch.
And PS... Im a woman. Shhhhh
And even better still.
Evidence that 0krapuker is likely a paid operative. Operatives use the Dephi Technique frequently. I advise everyone to read about the Dephi tech.so they can recognize it. Unfortunately the linked to the article isn’t active any more, I will look up for another article. Once you read about the methods, they’re easily recognizable. One may say, well, a FR thread is not a “meeting” with a “facilitator”.
A group of people having a discussion is a meeting, and in our case, there is no “official facilitator” but a person using the Dephi technique puts himself in a unappointed position by using these methods to steer the discussion in, to him, desired directions and away from other directions.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3250091/posts
Using the Delphi Technique to Achieve Consensus
Eagle Forum ^ | Nov 1998 | Lynn Stuter
Posted on 1/23/2015, 4:51:03 PM by Ray76
The Delphi Technique and consensus building are both founded in the same principle - the Hegelian dialectic of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, with synthesis becoming the new thesis.
In group settings, the Delphi Technique is an unethical method of achieving consensus on controversial topics. It requires well-trained professionals, known as “facilitators” or “change agents,” who deliberately escalate tension among group members, pitting one faction against another to make a preordained viewpoint appear “sensible,” while making opposing views appear ridiculous.
The facilitators or change agents encourage each person in a group to express concerns about the programs, projects, or policies in question. They listen attentively, elicit input from group members, form “task forces,” urge participants to make lists, and in going through these motions, learn about each member of a group. They are trained to identify the “leaders,” the “loud mouths,” the “weak or non-committal members,” and those who are apt to change sides frequently during an argument.
Suddenly, the amiable facilitators become professional agitators and “devil’s advocates.” Using the “divide and conquer” principle, they manipulate one opinion against another, making those who are out of step appear “ridiculous, unknowledgeable, inarticulate, or dogmatic.” They attempt to anger certain participants, thereby accelerating tensions. The facilitators are well trained in psychological manipulation. They are able to predict the reactions of each member in a group. Individuals in opposition to the desired policy or program will be shut out.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another one, the original article is still up:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2839005/posts
The Delphi Technique: Lets Stop Being Manipulated! (oldie but goodie)
Ether Zone.via VA Land Rights Commission ^ | September 23, 2002, issue of Ether Zone. | By Albert V. Burns
Posted on 1/27/2012, 2:11:35 PM by combat_boots
...we are seeing citizens being invited to participate in various forms of meetings...to help determine public policy in one field or another. They are supposedly being included to get input from the public ...
in one of these meetings...
...you will find that there is already someone designated to lead or facilitate the meeting. ...
Actually, he or she is there for exactly the opposite reason: to see that the conclusions reached during the meeting are in accord with a plan already decided upon by those who called the meeting.
The process used to facilitate the meeting is called the Delphi Technique. ...
However,...the steps of Delphi could be very valuable in manipulating ANY meeting toward a predetermined end.
How does the process take place? ...
First, the person who will be leading the meeting, the facilitator or Change Agent must be a likable person ...
It is, therefore, the job of the facilitator to find a way to cause a split in the audience, ...
Facilitators are trained to recognize potential opponents and how to make such people appear aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc. Once this is done, the facilitator establishes himself or herself as the friend of the rest of the audience....
At this point, the audience is generally broken up ...
Within each group, discussion takes place of issues, already decided upon by the leadership of the meeting. Here, too, the facilitator manipulates the discussion ...
Generally, participants are asked to write down their ideas and disagreements with the papers to be turned in and compiled ...
This is the weak link in the chain, which you are not supposed to recognize. Who compiles the various notes into the final agenda for discussion? Ahhhh! Well, it is those who are running the meeting.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Entire article:
http://www.vlrc.org/articles/110.html
The Delphi Technique: Lets Stop Being Manipulated!
By Albert V. Burns
More and more, we are seeing citizens being invited to participate in various forms of meetings, councils, or boards to help determine public policy in one field or another. They are supposedly being included to get input from the public to help officials make final decisions on taxes, education, community growth or whatever the particular subject matter might be.
Sounds great, doesnt it? Unfortunately, surface appearances are often deceiving.
You, Mr. or Mrs. Citizen, decide to take part in one of these meetings.
Generally, you will find that there is already someone designated to lead or facilitate the meeting. Supposedly, the job of the facilitator is to be a neutral, non-directing helper to see that the meeting flows smoothly.
Actually, he or she is there for exactly the opposite reason: to see that the conclusions reached during the meeting are in accord with a plan already decided upon by those who called the meeting.
The process used to facilitate the meeting is called the Delphi Technique. This Delphi Technique was developed by the RAND Corporation for the U.S. Department of Defense back in the 1950s. It was originally intended for use as a psychological weapon during the cold war.
However, it was soon recognized that the steps of Delphi could be very valuable in manipulating ANY meeting toward a predetermined end.
How does the process take place? The techniques are well developed and well defined.
First, the person who will be leading the meeting, the facilitator or Change Agent must be a likable person with whom those participating in the meeting can agree or sympathize.
It is, therefore, the job of the facilitator to find a way to cause a split in the audience, to establish one or a few of the people as bad guys while the facilitator is perceived as the good guy.
Facilitators are trained to recognize potential opponents and how to make such people appear aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc. Once this is done, the facilitator establishes himself or herself as the friend of the rest of the audience.
The stage is now set for the rest of the agenda to take place.
At this point, the audience is generally broken up into discussionor breakoutgroups of seven or eight people each. Each of these groups is to be led by a subordinate facilitator.
Within each group, discussion takes place of issues, already decided upon by the leadership of the meeting. Here, too, the facilitator manipulates the discussion in the desired direction, isolating and demeaning opposing viewpoints.
Generally, participants are asked to write down their ideas and disagreements with the papers to be turned in and compiled for general discussion after the general meeting is reconvened.
This is the weak link in the chain, which you are not supposed to recognize. Who compiles the various notes into the final agenda for discussion? Ahhhh! Well, it is those who are running the meeting.
How do you know that the ideas on your notes were included in the final result? You Dont! You may realize that your idea was not included and come to the conclusion that you were probably in the minority. Recognize that every other citizen member of this meeting has written his or her likes or dislikes on a similar sheet of paper and they, too, have no idea whether their ideas were compiled into the final result! You dont even know if anyones ideas are part of the final conclusions presented to the reassembled group as the consensus of public opinion.
Rarely does anyone challenge the process, since each concludes that he or she was in the minority and different from all the others.
So, now, those who organized the meeting in the first place are able to tell the participants and the rest of the community that the conclusions, reached at the meeting, are the result of public participation.
Actually, the desired conclusions had been established, in the back room, long before the meeting ever took place. There are variations in the technique to fit special situations but, in general, the procedure outlined above takes place.
The natural question to ask here is: If the outcome was preordained before the meeting took place, why have the meeting? Herein lies the genius of this Delphi Technique.
It is imperative that the general public believe that this program is theirs! They thought it up! They took part in its development! Their input was recognized!
If people believe that the program is theirs, they will support it.
If they get the slightest hint that the program is being imposed upon them, they will resist.
This very effective technique is being used, over and over and over, to change our form of government from the representative republic, intended by the Founding Fathers, into a participatory democracy.” Now, citizens chosen at large are manipulated into accepting preset outcomes while they believe that the input they provided produced the outcomes which are now theirs! The reality is that the final outcome was already determined long before any public meetings took place, determined by individuals unknown to the public. Can you say Conspiracy?
These Change Agents or Facilitators can be beaten! They may be beaten using their own methods against them.
Because it is so important, I will repeat the suggestions I gave in the last previous column. One: Never, never lose your temper! Lose your temper and lose the battle, it is that simple! Smile, if it kills you to do so. Be courteous at all times. Speak in a normal tone of voice.
Two: Stay focused! Always write your question or statement down in advance to help you remember the exact manner in which your question or statement was made.
These agents are trained to twist things to make anyone not acceding to their agenda look silly or aggressive. Smile, wait till the change agent gets done speaking and then bring them back to your question. If they distort what you said, simply remind those in the group that what he or she is saying is not what you asked or said and then repeat, verbatim, from your notes the original objection.
Three: Be persistent! Wait through any harangues and then repeat the original question. (Go back and reread the previous column.)
Four: (I wish to thank a reader of the previous column for some EXCELLENT suggestions.) Dont go alone! Get as many friends or relatives who think as you do, to go along with you to the meeting. Have each person armed with questions or statements which all generally support your central viewpoint. Dont sit together as a group! Spread out through the audience so that your group does not seem to be a group.
When the facilitator or change agent avoids answering your question and insists that he must move on so everyone may have a chance to speak, your own agents in the audience can then ask questions, worded differently, but still with the same meaning as yours. They can bring the discussion back to your original point.
They could even point out, in a friendly manner, that the agent did not really answer your question. The more the agent avoids your question, and the more your friends bring that to the attention of the group, the more the audience will shift in your favor.
To quote my informant: Turn the technique back on them and isolate the change agent as the kook. Ive done it and seen steam come out of the ears of those power brokers in the wings who are trying to shove something down the citizens throats. And its so much fun to watch the moderator squirm and lose his cool, all while trying to keep a smile on his face.
Now that you understand how meetings are manipulated, lets show them up for the charlatans which they are.
Yes indeed, I just included you because Okrapuker had commented to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.