So one of your people said the Big Event is set for August 31. Bagster thereafter stated “ the date has been locked in for three years”. What you are witnessing is Puker constructing "the big lie". This is how he operates.
First he makes the false allegation, he has it explained to him in detail why he is wrong to say that, the posted evidence is on the thread, and yet he repeats the lie.
He will now go from thread to thread telling people that Q said August 31 everybody will be arrested. When they are not, then Q has been debunked.
That's been the playbook for three years now.
Blue Horseshow theorized that there would be indictments on August 31. He also denied he had anything to do with Q.
Bagster said that the date for action has been pre-determined for three years or so now and did not give a date.
From that, Puker the mad says that Bagster said August 31.
These are the workings of a derp state embed.
Amirite, Puker?
So many dishonest tactics. I’m going to pick a few from the above article. The Dephi tactics are designed to work in a controlled “meeting” but we can see quite a few of them at work on this and other threads.
Some of the Delphi Tactics obvious on this and other threads:
It is, therefore, the job of the facilitator to find a way to cause a split in the audience, to establish one or a few of the people as “bad guys” while the facilitator is perceived as the “good guy.”
Facilitators are trained to recognize potential opponents and how to make such people appear aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc. Once this is done, the facilitator establishes himself or herself as the “friend” of the rest of the audience.
Actually, the desired conclusions had been established, in the back room, long before the meeting ever took place. There are variations in the technique to fit special situations but, in general, the procedure outlined above takes place.
The natural question to ask here is: If the outcome was preordained before the meeting took place, why have the meeting? Herein lies the genius of this Delphi Technique.
It is imperative that the general public believe that this program is theirs! They thought it up! They took part in its development! Their input was recognized!
ill support it.
If they get the slightest hint that the program is being imposed upon them, they will resist.
These “Change Agents” or “Facilitators” can be beaten! They may be beaten using their own methods against them.
Because it is so important, I will repeat the suggestions I gave in the last previous column. One: Never, never lose your temper! Lose your temper and lose the battle, it is that simple!
These agents are trained to twist things to make anyone not acceding to their agenda look silly or aggressive.
If they distort what you said, simply remind those in the group that what he or she is saying is not what you asked or said and then repeat, verbatim, from your notes the original objection.