Yes, I think we would have.
White noise. Don’t you think if there was a weapon recovered we would have heard about it?
They withheld the Floyd video for a month.
“Don’t you think if there was a weapon recovered we would have heard about it?”
Most times.
But this time the police, their union and the DA are saying absolutely nothing. Nothing.
Neither are Wisc state investigators.
Commendably.
“White noise. Don’t you think if there was a weapon recovered we would have heard about it?”
Naive, thy name is “Fido”.
No, I think the MSM would purposely suppress any mitigating evidence.
Several stopped frames of the independent phone video show what appears to be a knife in the perp's right hand.
Either a knife or a strip of aluminum foil from his lunch box...
Yeah, ‘cause there’s so little else going on that the MSM is clamoring for a story that would argue against the narrative they’ve pushed for the last 3 months.
fox news apparently reported he had a knife, and tried to get in some place- which if so, might have been why the police were there in the first place-
Last night on Fox Donna Brazile referred to the perp as “just a child.”
25 years old, long string of serious crimes, and boo-hoo, he’s “just a child.” Boohoohoohoo......
Donna is a racist DUMB@SS, clearly low IQ.
the video appears to show a Karambit knife (non-folding hook billed knife) in his left hand as he is coming around the front of the vehicle.
“Don’t you think if there was a weapon recovered we would have heard about it?”
Just like if he has a violent criminal record we would have heard about it? No, we won’t hear anything that could incriminate Saint Jacob in his responsibility towards this incident.
Yes, I think we would have.
Depends...Wisc. DOJ now in charge...Hopefully the truth will emerge and sooner is better than later :(
As I explained to my adult daughter.
Police agencies are slow to put out information about a serious investigation....that is old school but still around in many places.
The reason hardly any info is being put out is the investigators don’t want to taint witnesses and create fake witnesses.
If they put out the body cam footage early then multiple things happen.
The actual witnesses will be tainted. They see body cam video and it affects their memory....they “remember” things they actually never saw and “unremember” stuff that wasn’t caught in the body cam video they just watched. Their mind tells them...”guess I really didn’t hear/see/smell that because it isn’t on the body camera video.”
Then you have people who were not even there at the time of the incident or maye only heard something from inside their apt ir from behind a fence....then they see the video and it changes what they heard into something else entirely.
The mind begins filling in blanks in our memory with new info input to “make sense” of what happened.. to logically order the event or memory so it “makes sense.”
In today’s instant info broadcasting....the police administrators need to extremely quick quelling disinformation with rapid release of video and images to counter false narratives that lead to Kenosha or Minneapolis events.
The push pull of needs (info to public/protect Investigation) is extreme and in opposition to the success of each desired outcome.
I don’t know where the dividing line falls but it is a problem.