Steve Bannon Arrested on Charges of Defrauding Donors

CNBC.com ^

[mn-bush-man]

Headline only at this point

[odawg]

Of course, there are tons and tonsI don’t know. But what we all know is sufficient to nail the bastards. Just the FISA warrants alone are enough to send everyone who signed them to prison, and that includes Comey and Rosenstein.

That is what irritates me about Q. Inform yourselves, he insists. And I say, if I knew all the details in the same fashion as the angels in heaven know them, and all the multitudes who try to glean things from what he posts, there is not a thing we can do and it changes nothing. Whereas, there are plenty of people, like Barr, who have FULL knowledge and do nothing. And refuse to do anything.

And someone like you, who thinks you can peer through the veil, can you offer a clue as to why nothing is done? You should do us all a favor and explain it. Q can’t, just except, trust the plan. As in trust Sessions, trust Huber.

[bagster]

What you don't know is what Barr, Durham, and Trump are doing behind the scenes. You don't know because they don't tell you.

You do know that Barr/Durham are doing investigations. You know that because Barr has told you.

You will know the results of those investigations when the rest of us know. You didn't know about the Clinesmith charges until you were told. What else don't you know?

Until then, there is nothing you can do but trust the plan and support the President and AG Barr.

If you choose not to, then you accuse President Trump of being a failed President. And all the complaining and foot stomping only serves to demoralize and ultimately harms President Trump. When you harm President Trump, you harm those he represents. And you harm America.

I choose to support him.

[odawg]

“If you choose not to, then you accuse President Trump of being a failed President.”

No, No. No. I accuse Barr of not supporting Trump. The same with Wray. As far as I know, and you will be quick to point out that it is not very far, Barr fully supports Wray. Otherwise, Tom Fitton would not have to take him to court to pry loose some little redacted document every time he tries.

And Clinesmith is not a big catch, compared to Brennan and Clapper, and Obama, and Biden, and Comey. You really believe Clinesmith was doing what he did on his own?

[bagster]

No, No. No. I accuse Barr of not supporting Trump.

Yes, yes, yes. Barr supports Trump just fine. You judge before all the evidence is in. You are impatient, based on the information you 'know' right now. There are mountains of things you don't know.

Otherwise, Tom Fitton would not have to take him to court to pry loose some little redacted document every time he tries.

There can be two reasons that unredacted documents aren't release to Fitton, Congress, the press, or the people.

One reason would be nefarious and dirty.

The other could be to secure other other ongoing investigations.

You and many others don't seem to acknowledge reason number two, and consign the Clinton/Bush/Obama way as the only way. This is a new day, with a new President.

And Clinesmith is not a big catch, compared to Brennan and Clapper, and Obama, and Biden, and Comey.

Very true. He was just a soldier. Do you really believe that he will be the only one charged?

You really believe Clinesmith was doing what he did on his own?

What makes you think I believe that?

I know of the vast web of conspirators that have infested government departments for the past several decades (at least).

This 'coup' cannot be partitioned off at the FBI or the DOJ level. The deep state enemy is vast and world-wide.

Clinesmith is an ant in a much larger hive.

The only reason Barr trotted out the Clinesmith indictment at this time was due to the clamoring of the impatient, people like you and many here on FR and other places. He felt the need to let people like you know that the investigation was ongoing and on the right track.

It was a mistake.

He would much rather have not tipped his hand that there was a cooperator.

This is another example of how you and others' bitching can harm the investigations, Trump, MAGA, and America.

[bagster]

Here's a perfect example of what I'm talking about re: releasing documents.

Prosecutors Reveal Grand Jury Investigation Linked to Ghislaine Maxwell

(excerpt)

U.S. prosecutors leading the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell — the alleged longtime madam of Jeffrey Epstein — have requested that a judge refrain from making public certain documents due to an ongoing grand jury probe.

Would information such as this be better in the hands of Fitton, or the entity that can actually do something about it.

[odawg]

“The other could be to secure other other ongoing investigations.”

I got tired of hearing Comey, routinely and very smugly, hiding behind that one. All the players know for a surety that they are under investigation, theoretically. There have been enough investigations. Remember Huber and his hundreds of investigators, as per Q? Disappeared without a trace. The Inspector General and his investigation? Recommended indictments and ignored by Barr. Congress and all their investigations? The Senate Intelligence Committee, controlled by Republicans, just got around to clearing Trump, after all these years and with zero evidence to begin with.

Generally, when enough is gotten on culprits, you come down on top of them with all four feet and make them talk. You don’t wait to cross every t and dot every i.

“He felt the need to let people like you know that the investigation was ongoing and on the right track.

It was a mistake.”

It is alarming that you can channel Barr’s deep inner most thoughts and critique him. Most of us thought he was throwing something out there to make people think he was actually doing something. If, after all this time, he has not turned anyone, then he is incompetent or not trying.

[Cronos]

“Everyone does it” is not an excuse for robbing people

[Coronal]

The only “surprise” would be if any of it turned out to be true.

[Coronal]

There’s no valid report of Schilling being arrested.

[Jane Long]

I’ve not seen one, either.

Only (fake) news outlet ‘reports’ .... :- /

[bagster]

It is alarming that you can channel Barr’s deep inner most thoughts and critique him.

This comment is ironical coming form the contingent that thinks Barr is not doing the things he has blatantly has said he's doing.

If you think Barr is like Comey, then you just haven't been paying attention.

I think you and the other nabobs are burnt out.

Rediscover yourselves.

[odawg]

“This comment is ironical coming form the contingent that thinks Barr is not doing the things he has blatantly has said he’s doing.”

He hasn’t done much at all. I go by actions, not words. I agree with Trump that things are not happening like they should.

“If you think Barr is like Comey, then you just haven’t been paying attention.”

I never said, or hinted, that Barr is like Comey.

I once got enraged while watching a Republican candidate for president submit to the mighty Chris Wallace on a Sunday morning. So I sat down and wrote a post on Free Republic calling for Trump to run for president. I said that Trump would not do that and would not back down to anyone. I saw the post on my computer the other day, it was dated March 1, 2015. I got a lot of hate on this site for saying that; there were a lot of red hot Cruz bots on the site at the time. I was one of the first in the country, or this site, to call for a Trump candidacy. Question: how did I do that, in 2015, along with tens of millions of voters in 2016, who did not have Q to guide us? And how is not being a Q true believer expose me as being in opposition to Trump?

[bagster]

He hasn’t done much at all.

What an odd thing to say. Of course he has. You should update yourself on current events.

Question: how did I do that, in 2015, along with tens of millions of voters in 2016, who did not have Q to guide us? And how is not being a Q true believer expose me as being in opposition to Trump?

And then you failed to understand what he was doing and how he was doing it. You dismissed his Q program out of hand and worked aggressively to squash it.

That is not the action of a Trump supporter, though you can't even understand that. Trump appreciates the tepid support, but does not appreciate those working against him and his program to save the world.

And that is exactly what you are doing, though you know not what you do.

You are the unknowing enemy of MAGA.

[bagster]

He (Trump) hasn’t done much at all. I go by actions, not words.

For your continuing education.

President Donald J. Trump's Accomplishments List:

Class dismissed.

[odawg]

You posted:

“This comment is ironical coming form the contingent that thinks Barr is not doing the things he has blatantly has said he’s doing.”

I posted in response:

“He hasn’t done much at all.” The antecedent of that “he” is obvious to any sentient being to be Barr.

Then you posted, in response, a list of Donald Trump’s accomplishments, knowing full well that I was referring to Barr.

I regard Trump as one of the best, if not the greatest, president we have ever had. But you twist my words, which makes you a liar or an idiot if not lying purposely.

[Mr. K]

Bagster seems to be more and more of a troll lately.

[odawg]

“You dismissed his Q program out of hand and worked aggressively to squash it.”

My impact on Q is absolutely zero.

[bagster]

My impact on Q is absolutely zero.

Again, that's what you say, and might even be what you think, but again, you're wrong.

All of our words are heard or seen by someone. Your words join the collective influence and do have impact.

There are plenty of 'sheep' out there who are influenced by the prevailing or majority opinion. They will join in for fear of being called out for not. For being a Qook, so to speak.

Look at the prevailing attitude on FR at the moment. Most people who post will look at every positive development in Trump's fight against the derps and rail against it. Nothing is ever good enough for them and they constantly move the goalposts and sing their negative song.

They seem to do so with with little to no thought. I believe that most of them are just following the herd and trying to fit in, as they try to one up the next guy with their gloom and doom pronouncements.

Don't sell yourself short. You may be horribly wrong, and you are, but your voice does have impact.

And when you use it to attack Q, you attack Trump's program and Trump supporters. And by doing so, you attack Trump, the people he represents, and America.

These are truths you should know.

[bagster]

Then you posted, in response, a list of Donald Trump’s accomplishments, knowing full well that I was referring to Barr.

You don't write well. Try to be more clear in the future.

[bagster]

Bagster seems to be more and more of a troll lately.

This is a common mistake amongst the elderly. They come across a word or term on the internet, and seeking to seem cool and hip, they adopt it. Often misusing it.

That someone posts a contrary opinion to the prevailing attitude is not trolling, nor does it make that outlier a 'troll'.

Trolling is purposefully posting inflammatorily so as to get a negative reaction.

If I were to use your seeming definition, all you nattering nabobs of negativism and Q bashers would be trolls, rather than just annoying sheep.

Learn your terms.