Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NO MORE BETRAYALS: Sen. Josh Hawley Just Set The Standard For Conservative Supreme Court Justices
The Federalist ^ | July 27, 2020 | Christopher Bedford

Posted on 07/27/2020 1:43:28 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 07/27/2020 1:43:28 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“I will vote only for those Supreme Court nominees who have explicitly acknowledged that Roe v. Wade is wrongly decided.”

Just WOW!

2 posted on 07/27/2020 1:47:18 PM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I am becoming more and more impressed with Sen. Hawley.

Most U.S. Senators elected as conservatives start out great and then become part of the Washington swamp network. McCain, Hatch and Toomey being prime examples. Sen. Helms was one of the few who got better with age and Sen. Hawley looks like he might become such an exception as well.

3 posted on 07/27/2020 1:47:36 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Select someone who can’t be BLACKMAILED like Roberts is!


4 posted on 07/27/2020 1:49:21 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sound thinking. God bless him.


5 posted on 07/27/2020 1:52:12 PM PDT by scottiemom (As a retired Texas public4 school teacher, I highly recommend private school.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Definitely throwing some shade at the President’s two picks. And dropping bombs on Bush 2’s pick, that f*cking fraud. But, I wonder if his views conflict with some of the folks on the President’s short list, especially someone like Barrett and a few of the other women. Not that being woman is the only reason to pick any of them, but it is what it is. Can’t have an all male SCOTUS, not happening in this day and age.

GOP and the powerful, conservative Federalist Society’s tendency to focus on justices who have established records of conservative and libertarian business and government rulings, but no firmly established record of rulings that protect either marriage or the lives of the unborn.

Hawley is right, IMHO. If you’re on the record as being against that decision, then your Conservative Card is more or less punched.

Some of the other stuff is a no-brainer. I say that with the caveat that Roberts is and will continue to be a complete disaster, for as long as he is there. And he’ll only get worse. He’ll go further than Kennedy, who voted out of compassion as his time came to an end, and be worse as he’ll do it on spite for all those that loathe him. A list that continues to grow. Hopefully, if the President gets to replace RBG, and maybe another Lib on the court, Roberts will take his leave knowing that he won’t matter anymore. One can hope.


6 posted on 07/27/2020 1:52:20 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Absolutely. He is a big disapointment


7 posted on 07/27/2020 1:52:40 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

I’m all for Hawley’s idea, but a candidate that has that in his/her record will be subjected to a hearing that would make the Kavanaugh hearing look like the trial of a Cub Scout accused of being late for a meeting. Unfortunately that is what we are up against. Good luck with getting that person confirmed and then living to take the seat on the bench. Only an Act of God can get such a person confirmed. We will just have to pray that the Almighty will intervene.


8 posted on 07/27/2020 1:58:45 PM PDT by RatRipper ( Democrats and socialists are vile liars, thieves and murderers - enemies of good and America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

Select someone who can’t be BLACKMAILED like Roberts is!

Why can’t we find out what Roberts is being blackmailed for and then make it public?

Make him relinquish his USSC position.


9 posted on 07/27/2020 2:00:51 PM PDT by Dacula
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Only gun owners who truly respect the second amendment. That is sole criteria I care about.


10 posted on 07/27/2020 2:02:36 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Buy American, Hire American! End All Worker Visa Programs. Replace Visa Workers w/ American Workers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Word is that Hawley is positioning for a Whitehouse run in 2024. So far I like what I see but he caved on renaming the military bases.


11 posted on 07/27/2020 2:03:07 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

I believe that Senator Hawley clerked for John Roberts. That having been said, I think that Hawley and Cruz are the senators that I respect the most as far as identifying the best SCOTUS nominees.


12 posted on 07/27/2020 2:06:03 PM PDT by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

I am becoming more and more impressed with Sen. Hawley.


I’m being less and less impressed with Sen. Hawley. He’s running his mouth like a typical swamp Senator. He needs put the rubber on the road and insist his party engage instead of tweeting up a storm. Frankly, he reminds of Ben Sasse. Another new star who faded badly.


13 posted on 07/27/2020 2:07:04 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Litmus tests exist for a reason.

I’ve used litmus paper many times.


14 posted on 07/27/2020 2:09:33 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?my)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

Pardon the pun but Hawley is preaching to the choir. I’ve no time for these U. S. Senator who strut about and run their mouths like this the Senate is a debate club. Hawley is a member of the majority party in the Senate. Yet he seems to spend most of his time tweeting to no effect. We should expect more than that.


15 posted on 07/27/2020 2:09:41 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

I guess you are like me: sick and tired of people running their mouths without concrete, decisive action


16 posted on 07/27/2020 2:19:15 PM PDT by RatRipper ( Democrats and socialists are vile liars, thieves and murderers - enemies of good and America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Make sure they can’t be blackmailed.


17 posted on 07/27/2020 2:19:32 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Systemic liberalism is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman; Kaslin
I am becoming more and more impressed with Sen. Hawley.

I posted my first impression of Hawley back in December, after watching him during impeachment.

Mr Hawley is building quite a résumé for higher office. Yale Law, President of Yale Chapter Federalist Society, Lawyer (apparently specializing in defending religious liberties), Clerked for Chief Justice of SCOTUS, Professor of law, State Attorney General, Senator, young, tall, handsome, married to a pretty blond Lawyer/Professor of Law and has 2 kids. He has a disarming demeanor that reminds me just a little bit of Reagan, while his understated wit cuts without offending, just like Reagan. Is he “the real deal”? He certainly bears watching.

This action get's him some attention, and support in the pro-life movement, but could hurt him with other constituencies. Still, nice to see he has the courage to stand up for his beliefs.

And dropping bombs on Bush 2’s pick, that f*cking fraud.

Both Josh and his wife Erin Hawley clerked for Chief Justice Roberts. In fact, that is how they met. If this slight was aimed at Roberts, as many interpret, it's both brutal and personal.

18 posted on 07/27/2020 2:36:17 PM PDT by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
If there is no indication in their record that at any time they have acknowledged that Roe was wrong at the time it was decided, then I’m not going to vote for them.'

Have either of Trump's selections ever said Roe was OK? What makes him think any future one will?

And should Biden win then the chance of Hawley ever voting to confirm them hovers somewhere between zero and none. Josh is grandstanding again.

19 posted on 07/27/2020 2:45:25 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

You are an idiot


20 posted on 07/27/2020 2:53:27 PM PDT by Dartoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson