Austin police officer appeared to grope a woman's breast after pulling her over

Insider via Yahoo News ^ | 7/9/2020 | Inyoung Choi

[Menehune56]

A video on social media shows a male Austin police officer appearing to grope a woman's breasts while performing a search following an apparent traffic violation.

In the video, which circulated Tuesday, the woman, identified by police as Rosalinda Nuno Trevino, demands a female officer while the officer continues to search the woman in front of a parked police vehicle.

[Menehune56]

It's pretty clear from the police report this female motorist was instigating the arrest, probably in hopes of a pay day. The video shows a by-the-book search in the face of non-stop provocation. The comments at Yahoo are overwhelmingly pro-police, good to see.

[entropy12]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1280374462542745605

[Bell Bouy II]

Standard back handed under bra swipe to detect a weapon.

Would have been nice to see the big mouth in the back ground arrested for obstruction, if only to deplete which I am sure is his already skimpy bank account

[Sans-Culotte]

I liked this comment at the site:

In the age of fluid sexuality, transgender, #$%$ etc. what does it matter to have a female police officer brought in? How do we know how the suspect identifies? How presumptuous of the videographer to assume a female officer would have made the suspect more comfortable.

[cuban leaf]

I just watched. He was using the front of his bent wrist to check for anything under her breasts. It’s appropriate.

If he had used his hands, that would be different.

You can hold a knife under those things, easily.

[joshua c]

The motorcycle cop could identify as female for purposes of the search. Ya know...gender fluidity and such.

[SunkenCiv]

...

[Rebelbase]

Cop cops a feel.

[Rebelbase]

He’s making sure she isn’t booby trapped.

[chopperk]

The officer got an intentional freebie.

[NohSpinZone]

Uh, don’t flatter yourself, lady. You’re not worth the headache. Guilty.

[Bell Bouy II]

Very Cheap thrill for sure

Back hand with a glove

[FreedomPoster]

Comments at Yahoo are often quite sensible.

[faucetman]

He was just checking her for “weapons”....WAIT... THOSE ARE weapons! /s

[deport]

For what It's worth department.

https://twitter.com/Cryientist/status/1280376280454660097/photo/1>

[conservative98]

I just watched. He was using the GS-1 free grope technique to check for anything under her breasts. It’s appropriate.

If he had used the multiple grope technique, that would be different.

[csvset]

[faucetman]

This woman is a WHACK JOB!

Read this court order about a DIFFERENT police officer whom she had a child with. She is “certifiable”.

Rosalinda Trevino v. Brian O’Quinn, 03-18-00197-CV (Tex. App. 2019)

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4657655/rosalinda-trevino-v-brian-oquinn/

[faucetman]

See #18

[deport]

This woman is a WHACK JOB!

***********

Yep for sure.
See post #15 above for more info on the Officer and her relationship.