To: jazusamo
Even the commies were afraid to go there. It would negate even having elections.
5 posted on
07/06/2020 7:36:01 AM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies)
To: jmaroneps37
Not necessarily. Remember their hots for giving all EC votes for the guy with the most votes nationally.
8 posted on
07/06/2020 7:38:22 AM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: jmaroneps37
Even the commies were afraid to go there. It would negate even having elections.Yep, now let's have them rule on the integrity of unsupervised mail in ballot free for alls.
39 posted on
07/06/2020 8:03:08 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
(#openupstateny)
To: jmaroneps37
Agree. The fact that the decision was unanimous shows how bad the idea was.
47 posted on
07/06/2020 8:19:50 AM PDT by
livius
To: jmaroneps37
The Constitution does not require elections for the Electors. State legislatures are free to choose Electors, it’s just that all states have chosen to have the Electors elected.
62 posted on
07/06/2020 8:59:08 AM PDT by
hanamizu
To: jmaroneps37
Even the commies were afraid to go there. It would negate even having elections. Yep. All it would take is for a well-funded Soros type to fund billions to pay off enough electors to get the desired “election” result.
105 posted on
07/06/2020 11:48:41 AM PDT by
fwdude
(Pass up too many hills to die on, and youÂ’ll eventually fall in to some ocean and perish.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson