Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe 6-pack
By your logic apparently, if a gay scoutmaster harassed and killed the scout, the scout should be blamed for creating the condition for temptation.

You think it's unreasonable for a father to keep his son out of the hands of a gay scoutmaster?

I would think every father would not allow this to happen.

110 posted on 07/01/2020 2:33:16 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
"You think it's unreasonable for a father to keep his son out of the hands of a gay scoutmaster?"

I think its reasonable for a father to keep his son from any real or perceived risk the father feels it's prudent to keep his son away from.

That's totally irrelevant to the issue at hand. If a boyscout is molested by a gay scout master, my issue is with the policy makers at BSA, and I would not hurl any smears at the victimized scout.

You may disagree with women in any role in the military, but either you're too simple minded or too cowardly to speak against the policy makers that permitted it and jumped into blame and belittle the victim mode from the outset of this thread.

I am a former military police officer. The military police corps exists, largely in part because soldier misconduct exists. I've seen violence done by male on male soldiers, female on male soldiers and male on female soldiers. None of it, when unprovoked, is excusable, nor the fault of the victim.

119 posted on 07/01/2020 2:53:20 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson