I think its reasonable for a father to keep his son from any real or perceived risk the father feels it's prudent to keep his son away from.
That's totally irrelevant to the issue at hand. If a boyscout is molested by a gay scout master, my issue is with the policy makers at BSA, and I would not hurl any smears at the victimized scout.
You may disagree with women in any role in the military, but either you're too simple minded or too cowardly to speak against the policy makers that permitted it and jumped into blame and belittle the victim mode from the outset of this thread.
I am a former military police officer. The military police corps exists, largely in part because soldier misconduct exists. I've seen violence done by male on male soldiers, female on male soldiers and male on female soldiers. None of it, when unprovoked, is excusable, nor the fault of the victim.
I would hurl plenty at any guardian stupid enough to allow him to be in such an outfit.
You may disagree with women in any role in the military, but either you're too simple minded or too cowardly to speak against the policy makers that permitted it and jumped into blame and belittle the victim mode from the outset of this thread.
Dude, i've been speaking against this since Patricia Schroeder first dragged out this stupid idea. Phyllis Schlafly used to tear her a new one on the issue.
I am a former military police officer. The military police corps exists, largely in part because soldier misconduct exists. I've seen violence done by male on male soldiers, female on male soldiers and male on female soldiers. None of it, when unprovoked, is excusable, nor the fault of the victim.
How well did the Female MPs do? Did you have to protect them? Or is this a subject you would rather not discuss?