Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary Trump's publisher claims no knowledge of NDA after judge's halt order; says tell-all has shipped.
Fox News ^ | July 1, 2020 | Brie Stimson

Posted on 07/01/2020 7:13:28 AM PDT by L.A.Justice

The publisher of a “tell-all” book by a niece of President Trump said it might be unable to prevent her book from becoming public -- adding it was unaware of any non-disclosure agreement that would prevent the book from being published -- after a judge ordered a temporary halt on its release, according to reports.

Simon & Schuster said it had already shipped out thousands of a 75,000-copy run of Mary Trump's “Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man."

The books had already been printed before the New York Supreme Court judge's ruling, The Washington Post reported.

The book is scheduled to be released July 28 -- less than four months before the presidential election -- but Judge Hal Greenwald issued a temporary restraining order until he can hear arguments next week after the president’s younger brother, Robert Trump, filed a court action.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: halgreenwald; judiciary; newyorksupremecourt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Fido969

After the massive amount awarded to President Trump when he sues this nasty back stabbing piece of garbage and her publisher, Simon & Schuster might have to go out of business.


21 posted on 07/01/2020 8:23:20 AM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice
adding it was unaware of any non-disclosure agreement

Any honest judge is going to say that doesn't matter. The publisher SHOULD HAVE known. A party is not allowed to avoid contract provisions by making themselves ignorant by choice.

22 posted on 07/01/2020 8:30:02 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: albie
"Who cares? It’ll be bought up by the libs, if at all."
15 copies is all it'll take. ABCNBCCBSCNNMSDNC ETC. will go 24/7 with it.

Judge will rule no prior restraint - its in the public domain and newsworthy.

23 posted on 07/01/2020 8:33:43 AM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Exactly.

The *ONLY* case in which prior restraint should ever apply is in classified information the release of which would cause quantifiable damage to governmental persons or property; not CYA bullshit like the Pentagon Papers.


24 posted on 07/01/2020 8:40:44 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca. Deport all illegals. Abolish the DEA, IRS and ATF,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: L.A.Justice

What is the problem? It is just money..

Like any other publisher this publisher will have to recall the books, pay for the expense of the recall and then burn the books.

Why would they be treated any differently?.

Of course, sale and distribution of the books would be illegal and the publisher’s staff and management ought to be arrested if the books are not recalled.


25 posted on 07/01/2020 10:01:11 AM PDT by Toughluck_freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson