Former Bush spokesman Scott McClellan's anti-Bush book "What Happened?" was released in June 2008, so Bush was ALSO still the sitting President in the White House at the time, and Obama's election as President was still months away.
Gosh, that seems a LOT more recent than the 1939 date that the "Historians" agree was the most recent time a "top Presidential official" published a book critical of the President they served while he was still in office.
I bet I could find numerous other examples if I researched the topic a bit more and looked at other administrations.
Someone should confront these biased "historians" because they seem to be "missing" quite a few examples. Perhaps because those books don't fit their narrative?
