[DouglasKC]

Seriously? So removing ALL references to native Americans...essentially erasing them and their influence from history...is considered a good thing?

[treetopsandroofs]

“So removing ALL references to native Americans...essentially erasing them and their influence from history...is considered a good thing?”

The next logical step would be to take away their casinos.

[maro]

Will India have to change its name? Seriously, “chief” is derived from Norman French and predates the colonization of America by Europeans. So if “chief” must go, why not “India”?

[KarlInOhio]

Seriously? So removing ALL references to native Americans...essentially erasing them and their influence from history...is considered a good thing?

I saw a witty comment yesterday on the redesign of the Land o Lakes butter packages: remove the Indian but keep the land - just like history.

[Dacula]

You can not call that person the “Head” of the department, because Monica Lewinsky and porn stars might get offended.

[Teacher317]

Better change the names of Seattle, Indiana and Indianapolis, Kansas, Iowa, Illinois, Oklahoma (Chocraw word for "red people"), the Dakotas, Utah, Miami...

And what do we call Chief Seattle in the history books now? Registered Leader Seattle?

[Responsibility2nd]

Seriously? So removing ALL references to native Americans...essentially erasing them and their influence from history...is considered a good thing?

_________________________________________

It must be.

Liberals are currently erasing Aunt Jemima, Hattie McDaniel and Uncle Ben. Like they got rid of Uncle Remus and Song of the South

This could only mean one thing:

Black culture and history is offensive. Canceling it is the only option.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Seems backward to me...