Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Supreme Court rules against assault weapons ban amendment
washingtonexaminer.com ^ | John Haughey

Posted on 06/05/2020 9:40:34 AM PDT by rktman

The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday knocked a proposed constitutional amendment to ban possession of “assault-style weapons” from a prospective berth on the 2022 ballot.

In a 4-1 decision, the court ruled Ban Assault Weapons NOW’s 75-word ballot summary “affirmatively misleads voters” by contradicting broader text in the proposed amendment.

“Specifically, the next-to-last sentence of the ballot summary informs voters the initiative ‘exempts and requires registration of assault weapons lawfully possessed prior to this provision’s effective date’ when, in fact, the initiative does no such thing,” the majority opinion said. “Contrary to the ballot summary, the initiative’s text exempts only ‘the person’s,’ meaning the current owner’s, possession of that assault weapon.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; fl; kaba
Well, it's a step in the right direction. Too bad they ruled on context of the wording (lies) and not the number one issue. INFRINGEMENT of individuals rights to KABA. Misleading is what they do. So, will it move up the road to D.C. and SCOTUS?
1 posted on 06/05/2020 9:40:34 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

YAAAA!

All weapons are ‘assault’ weapons....................


2 posted on 06/05/2020 9:44:06 AM PDT by Red Badger (Always trust God............but wash your hands......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
"Too bad they ruled on context of the wording (lies) and not the number one issue. INFRINGEMENT of individuals rights to KABA."

The wording of the proposed ballot initiative was the issue.

"Misleading is what they do. So, will it move up the road to D.C. and SCOTUS?"

No. It's not a federal issue. It's an issue about the wording on the ballot.

3 posted on 06/05/2020 9:49:20 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

LOL! And, ‘unarmed’ does NOT mean ‘undangerous’.


4 posted on 06/05/2020 9:57:18 AM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I can ‘assault’ someone with a stick...................


5 posted on 06/05/2020 10:00:27 AM PDT by Red Badger (Always trust God............but wash your hands......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I doubt it has any life left it, precisely because the finding was that the proposed amendment itself contained materially misleading statements. Appeals have to be grounded in law. Pretty hard to argue a ruling of “self-evident bag of deliberate lies”.

More likely the Florida gun banners (ex-NY and NJ who can’t wait to ruin another state?) will have to start over after being exposed as frauds, and rioting that reminded even idiots why we need high capacity semi-autos for self defense.


6 posted on 06/05/2020 10:06:26 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

read the other day a Florida mayor has suspended people’s right to buy any guns- declaring the state to be in a ‘state of emergency’- I’ll see if i can find the artcle


7 posted on 06/05/2020 10:19:39 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

BREAKING: Florida Mayor Declares State of Emergency In Wake Of Protests, Temporarily Bans Gun and Ammunition Sales

https://www.chicksonright.com/blog/2020/06/04/breaking-florida-mayor-declares-state-of-emergency-in-wake-of-protests-temporarily-bans-gun-and-ammunition-sales/


8 posted on 06/05/2020 10:21:33 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

NY and i believe other states used the excuse of ‘imminent need’ to severely restrict gun sale and gun ownership, and gun features- Now Florida mayor is using the excuse of ‘state of emergency’ to try to justify his violating the constitution-

There should be fines for states that ram through legislation that violate the constitution - massive fines- States can cite companies hundreds of billions of dollars fro violating laws- states should be obligated to obey the constitution and not violate rights

IN NY- the fictional ‘imminent need’ must be permanent now? Because i believe they still are under the constitution violating ‘safe act’


9 posted on 06/05/2020 10:27:26 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Don’t worry. They will change the word ‘assault’ if necessary.


10 posted on 06/05/2020 12:04:59 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson