Skip to comments.
Researchers tested 4,160 people for Coronavirus in a San Francisco neighborhood. Not a single white person tested positive.
Yahoo News ^
| 05/28/2020
| Kathryn Krawczyk
Posted on 05/28/2020 6:45:30 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
A coronavirus testing project in San Francisco has provided yet another example of how COVID-19 is overwhelmingly affecting people of color.
Diane Havlir, the director of the HIV/AIDS division at the University of California, San Francisco, noticed early in the pandemic that young Latino men were arriving at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital with coronavirus symptoms more often than any other demographic. So she conducted a research project that involved testing 4,160 residents of San Francisco's Mission District and found that not a single white person tested positive, Stat News reports.
Havlir's project focused on a single, 16-square-block census tract in the Mission district, "one of the city's most densely populated and heavily Latinx neighborhoods," Stat News writes. A third of the tract's residents are white, while 58 percent are Hispanic, the U.S. Census estimates. But 95 percent of those who tested positive were Latinx, while no white person in the tract tested positive.
Just like testing and death rates are revealing across the country, "what really comes out of these data is that low-wage essential workers are victims of this disease," Havlir told Stat News. And with 53 percent of those who tested positive showing no symptoms of coronavirus, it's even more clear that allowing workers to stay home only if they feel sick may not be enough to stop the spread. Read more at Stat News.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: botox; california; coronavirus; cv19; nancypelosi; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; tests; timeline; virus; white
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: willk
#46. Dem white folk don’t count because they are all “raciss”. /sarc
To: mewzilla
Were any caucasians actually tested? Trust but verify.
That was my first question too. I am surprised it took 23 posts, for someone to actually ask the question. 🤗
62
posted on
05/28/2020 8:15:25 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(Father of US Air Force Officer, who graduated from Air Force pilot training, on 1 May 2020)
To: The_Media_never_lie
RE: So, what is the point of this article?
So that wise folks can determine the reason why this is so.
63
posted on
05/28/2020 8:28:20 PM PDT
by
SeekAndFind
(look at Michigan, it will)
To: The_Media_never_lie
So, what is the point of this article?Racism. 😁🤪
64
posted on
05/28/2020 8:30:51 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(Father of US Air Force Officer, who graduated from Air Force pilot training, on 1 May 2020)
To: SeekAndFind
yahoo cherry-picked the crap out of the stat news article.
Statnews headline:"When hard data are ‘heartbreaking’: Testing blitz in San Francisco shows Covid-19 struck mostly low-wage workers"
from stat news:
While Havlir expected to see the Latinx community hit hard by the virus, the actual numbers came as a shock. About 2% of people tested positive for the coronavirus. Nearly all of them — 95% — were Latinx. The other 5% were Asian or Pacific Islander. Not a single white person tested positive, though 34% of the tract’s residents are white, according to the U.S. Census; 58% are Hispanic.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/28/sobering-finding-covid19-struck-mostly-low-wage-essential-workers-san-francisco/
2% is 83 people. 53% or 44 people were asymptomatic
65
posted on
05/28/2020 8:34:52 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: SeekAndFind
This looks like a graph of obesity rates or hygiene.
66
posted on
05/28/2020 8:35:51 PM PDT
by
UnwashedPeasant
(Trump is solving the world's problems only to distract us from Russia.)
To: SeekAndFind
Maybe they had it already. Did they test for antibodies?
67
posted on
05/28/2020 8:43:33 PM PDT
by
mom.mom
(...our flag was still there.)
To: SeekAndFind
*blacks are more likely to use public transportation.
68
posted on
05/28/2020 9:09:23 PM PDT
by
Crucial
To: SeekAndFind; rktman
Dang it!
Somebody must have spilled the beans!
They're on to us!
69
posted on
05/28/2020 9:12:46 PM PDT
by
Eagles6
To: SeekAndFind
“...allowing workers to stay home only if they feel sick may not be enough to stop the spread.”
This is the endgame. And then welfare, dependency, and endless left-wing voting.
To: LouieFisk
lol
yeah it picks on people that live like animals
71
posted on
05/28/2020 9:55:27 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(Radicals N racists dont point ftingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin to make ends meet)
To: SeekAndFind
or maybe what it really shows is that white folk are more likely to adhere to stay-at-home and social distancing rules, and minorities are more likely to disregard social distancing as not applicable to them
72
posted on
05/28/2020 10:04:10 PM PDT
by
blueplum
("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017))
To: SeekAndFind
The left is pushing hard for a race war.
73
posted on
05/29/2020 12:26:28 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(This tagline is an advertisement-free zone. Is yours?)
To: adorno
You are obviously not following the Science.
74
posted on
05/29/2020 5:23:23 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: yesthatjallen
Gay men are known for casual sex. Why haven't we seen clusters of infections in gay communities?
Widespread use of anti viral drugs? Given their horrifically filthy lifestyle, I also though homos would be coronavirus central. Who knew?
To: Paladin2
You are obviously not following the Science.
Obviously, you follow the science that makes you feel good and superior, while it's just pure garbage.
76
posted on
05/29/2020 5:39:12 AM PDT
by
adorno
To: adorno
Why is anybody tracking CV2 by race/ethnicity if not to sow discention?
What possible explainations of the data do you propose?
77
posted on
05/29/2020 6:07:54 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: SeekAndFind
Not many whites live in the Mission district!
Also I would question what was her sample population? Where did she find the people to test?
Did she deliberately only sample Hispanics?
I don’t believe any of them.
They bastardize scientific methods to fit their agenda.
78
posted on
05/29/2020 6:12:17 AM PDT
by
HereInTheHeartland
(Leave me alone, I have no incriminating evidence on the Clintons)
To: DannyTN; xp38
79
posted on
05/29/2020 6:21:43 AM PDT
by
lizma2
To: Paladin2
Why is anybody tracking CV2 by race/ethnicity if not to sow discention?
What possible explainations of the data do you propose?
I guess I must've been interpreting your posts the wrong way.
But, there are many who would take the results, even if junk science, to make themselves feel superior.
80
posted on
05/29/2020 6:37:50 AM PDT
by
adorno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson