Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers tested 4,160 people for Coronavirus in a San Francisco neighborhood. Not a single white person tested positive.
Yahoo News ^ | 05/28/2020 | Kathryn Krawczyk

Posted on 05/28/2020 6:45:30 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

A coronavirus testing project in San Francisco has provided yet another example of how COVID-19 is overwhelmingly affecting people of color.

Diane Havlir, the director of the HIV/AIDS division at the University of California, San Francisco, noticed early in the pandemic that young Latino men were arriving at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital with coronavirus symptoms more often than any other demographic. So she conducted a research project that involved testing 4,160 residents of San Francisco's Mission District — and found that not a single white person tested positive, Stat News reports.

Havlir's project focused on a single, 16-square-block census tract in the Mission district, "one of the city's most densely populated and heavily Latinx neighborhoods," Stat News writes. A third of the tract's residents are white, while 58 percent are Hispanic, the U.S. Census estimates. But 95 percent of those who tested positive were Latinx, while no white person in the tract tested positive.

Just like testing and death rates are revealing across the country, "what really comes out of these data is that low-wage essential workers are victims of this disease," Havlir told Stat News. And with 53 percent of those who tested positive showing no symptoms of coronavirus, it's even more clear that allowing workers to stay home only if they feel sick may not be enough to stop the spread. Read more at Stat News.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: botox; california; coronavirus; cv19; nancypelosi; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; tests; timeline; virus; white
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: willk

#46. Dem white folk don’t count because they are all “raciss”. /sarc


61 posted on 05/28/2020 8:09:40 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Were any caucasians actually tested?

Trust but verify.

That was my first question too. I am surprised it took 23 posts, for someone to actually ask the question. 🤗

62 posted on 05/28/2020 8:15:25 PM PDT by Mark17 (Father of US Air Force Officer, who graduated from Air Force pilot training, on 1 May 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

RE: So, what is the point of this article?

So that wise folks can determine the reason why this is so.


63 posted on 05/28/2020 8:28:20 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
So, what is the point of this article?

Racism. 😁🤪

64 posted on 05/28/2020 8:30:51 PM PDT by Mark17 (Father of US Air Force Officer, who graduated from Air Force pilot training, on 1 May 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
yahoo cherry-picked the crap out of the stat news article.

Statnews headline:"When hard data are ‘heartbreaking’: Testing blitz in San Francisco shows Covid-19 struck mostly low-wage workers"

from stat news:
While Havlir expected to see the Latinx community hit hard by the virus, the actual numbers came as a shock. About 2% of people tested positive for the coronavirus. Nearly all of them — 95% — were Latinx. The other 5% were Asian or Pacific Islander. Not a single white person tested positive, though 34% of the tract’s residents are white, according to the U.S. Census; 58% are Hispanic.

https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/28/sobering-finding-covid19-struck-mostly-low-wage-essential-workers-san-francisco/

2% is 83 people. 53% or 44 people were asymptomatic
65 posted on 05/28/2020 8:34:52 PM PDT by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This looks like a graph of obesity rates or hygiene.


66 posted on 05/28/2020 8:35:51 PM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (Trump is solving the world's problems only to distract us from Russia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Maybe they had it already. Did they test for antibodies?


67 posted on 05/28/2020 8:43:33 PM PDT by mom.mom (...our flag was still there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

*blacks are more likely to use public transportation.


68 posted on 05/28/2020 9:09:23 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; rktman
Dang it!

Somebody must have spilled the beans!

They're on to us!

69 posted on 05/28/2020 9:12:46 PM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“...allowing workers to stay home only if they feel sick may not be enough to stop the spread.”

This is the endgame. And then welfare, dependency, and endless left-wing voting.


70 posted on 05/28/2020 9:13:35 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouieFisk

lol

yeah it picks on people that live like animals


71 posted on 05/28/2020 9:55:27 PM PDT by dp0622 (Radicals N racists dont point ftingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

or maybe what it really shows is that white folk are more likely to adhere to stay-at-home and social distancing rules, and minorities are more likely to disregard social distancing as not applicable to them


72 posted on 05/28/2020 10:04:10 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The left is pushing hard for a race war.


73 posted on 05/29/2020 12:26:28 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (This tagline is an advertisement-free zone. Is yours?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno

You are obviously not following the Science.


74 posted on 05/29/2020 5:23:23 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Gay men are known for casual sex. Why haven't we seen clusters of infections in gay communities?

Widespread use of anti viral drugs? Given their horrifically filthy lifestyle, I also though homos would be coronavirus central. Who knew?
75 posted on 05/29/2020 5:32:34 AM PDT by farming pharmer (fork you :(){ :|:& };:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
You are obviously not following the Science.

Obviously, you follow the science that makes you feel good and superior, while it's just pure garbage.
76 posted on 05/29/2020 5:39:12 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Why is anybody tracking CV2 by race/ethnicity if not to sow discention?

What possible explainations of the data do you propose?


77 posted on 05/29/2020 6:07:54 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not many whites live in the Mission district!

Also I would question what was her sample population? Where did she find the people to test?
Did she deliberately only sample Hispanics?

I don’t believe any of them.
They bastardize scientific methods to fit their agenda.


78 posted on 05/29/2020 6:12:17 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Leave me alone, I have no incriminating evidence on the Clintons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN; xp38

Malaria and chloroquine?


79 posted on 05/29/2020 6:21:43 AM PDT by lizma2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Why is anybody tracking CV2 by race/ethnicity if not to sow discention?

What possible explainations of the data do you propose?


I guess I must've been interpreting your posts the wrong way.

But, there are many who would take the results, even if junk science, to make themselves feel superior.


80 posted on 05/29/2020 6:37:50 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson