Posted on 05/25/2020 7:55:41 AM PDT by Kaslin
If the United States doesn’t follow through to revoke Hong Kong’s special treatment, Beijing may be emboldened to take aggressive actions against Taiwan.
May 22, 2020 will go down in history as an important milestone. On this day, Beijing announced it will impose a new national security law on Hong Kong, which will effectively end the “One Country, Two Systems” era.
Beijing made the move at this week’s “Two Sessions,” annual legislative meetings of two organizations: the National People’s Congress (NPC) and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC). In the past, more than 5,000 delegates, representing the elites in China, from Communist Party members to business executives to movie stars, played their part in this annual political theater. They have no real legislative power, merely rubber stamping whatever the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) presents with 100 percent approval.
In truth, the Two Sessions serve as fig leaves that barely cover the regime’s dictatorial nature. Still, analysts pay a great deal of attention to these meetings because the CCP has historically used them to unveil important national policies, such as the annual economic target and budget, and any leadership changes.
Since 1998, the “Two Sessions” have been usually held in the first week of March. This year the meetings were delayed due to the coronavirus outbreak. They have drawn even more international attention this year to what Beijing plans to do with Hong Kong.
Beijing has pushed Hong Kong to pass a national security law for years. Beijing and its supporters often point to Article 23 of the Basic Law, a de facto constitution for Hong Kong, as legal justification. Article 23 stipulates that Hong Kong, not Beijing, “shall enact laws on its own to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against the Central People’s Government (CPG), or theft of state secrets, to prohibit foreign political organizations or bodies from conducting political activities in the Region, and to prohibit political organizations or bodies of the Region from establishing ties with foreign political organizations or bodies.”
The Basic Law was drafted by a committee set up by China’s National People’s Congress in 1987. The draft committee consisted of members from both the mainland and Hong Kong. In 1989, Martin Lee and Szeto Wah, both representing Hong Kong on the Basic Law drafting committee, voiced their support for student protestors in Beijing and announced the suspension of their work for the committee.
Later that year when they tried to return to their work at the committee, Beijing expelled them and accused them of “subverting state power.” Without the Hong Kong pro-democracy camp’s involvement, the Basic Law became a product of Beijing, which laid the foundation for future unrest in Hong Kong. China approved the final version of the Basic Law on April 4, 1990, giving the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC) the final say in any interpretation.
In 2003, Beijing-appointed Hong Kong Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa said that according to Article 23 of the Basic Law, the city’s Legco needed to pass an anti-subversion bill that would impose maximum life prison sentences for treason, sedition, theft of state secrets, and subversion. Beijing supported the bill since it frequently uses similar laws to crack down on activists and dissidents in mainland China.
Hong Kongers were concerned that the definition of what constitutes subversion was so far-reaching that someone who organizes a peaceful protest could be charged if this bill became law. In addition, the bill would have given Tung’s government broad authority to outlaw any local groups with ties to any organization banned by Beijing.
It would also have given Hong Kong police the power to conduct searches without a warrant and ban disclosing state secrets. Therefore, on July 2, 2003, a day after Hong Kong’s government and Beijing celebrated the six-year anniversary of Hong Kong’s handover, more than 500,000 Hong Kongers took to the streets to protest this bill, which they believed could erode their political, religious, and press freedom. Facing such a strong opposition, Tung withdrew the controversial bill and none of his successors re-introduced it.
Last year, current Hong Kong chief Carrie Lam had to shelve her controversial extradition bill after millions of Hong Kongers took to the streets to voice their concerns for months, which eventually led to some fierce, violent confrontations between Hong Kong Police and protestors. The year 2019 ended with pro-democracy candidates earning a landslide win in the local district council election.
Beijing was clearly incensed as the events unfolded in 2019: Lam’s inability to pass the extradition bill, the ongoing protests that won international admiration and support, and the defeat of pro-Beijing candidates at the ballot box in local elections. 2020 hasn’t gone well for Beijing either. First China had to take draconian measures to contain the coronavirus outbreak, which has devastated China’s economy. After the outbreak became a global pandemic, Beijing’s international reputation and credibility plunged as countries blamed Beijing for mishandling the virus in its early days.
Still, Beijing wouldn’t let anything delay a more hard-line stand in Hong Kong. Hong Kong authorities arrested a number of prominent pro-democracy activists for their roles in the 2019 anti-extradition bill protests. Beijing appointed hardliner Xia Baolong the new director of its Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office (HKMAO).
Xia has openly Hong Kong’s pro-democracy lawmakers for filibustering bills Beijing wants to pass. In a dramatic scene this week, a few of the lawmakers he condemned were dragged out of the legislative council during a debate about a bill that would criminalize any action disrespecting the Chinese national anthem.
Beijing has clearly lost patience and decided there is no more need for pretense. The Two Sessions seems a perfect opportunity for Beijing to force a national security law down Hong Kong’s throat while bypassing Hong Kong’s legislature: 100 percent delegates from NPC and CPPCC will approve the bill. Mass protests in Hong Kong over this are difficult to organize because the city is still slowly emerging from the coronavirus shutdown.
Dennis Kwok, a pro-democracy legislator in Hong Kong, said Beijing’s action “basically means the end of ‘One Country, Two Systems.’” Maya Wang of Human Rights Watch tweeted, “Watching the fate of Hong Kong people being decided in Beijing tonight was like watching the Tiananmen Massacre in Beijing in 1989–that same feeling of powerlessness, the sadness, about the rights of people being trampled upon.”
Last November, the U.S. Congress passed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act (HRDA), which requires the U.S. Department of State to evaluate whether Hong Kong is still upholding the rule of law and protecting human rights and certify to Congress each year whether the city still warrants special treatment, different from mainland China, under various treaties and agreements.
Beijing’s action on Hong Kong this week puts the HRDA to a real test. If the United States doesn’t follow through on the act to revoke Hong Kong’s special treatment, Beijing will treat the act as a paper tiger and may be emboldened to take aggressive actions against Taiwan. If the United States does follow through on the act and revoke Hong Kong’s special treatment, Beijing will retaliate and the U.S.-China relationship will fall to a historical low, which will likely lead to many unforeseen economic, political, and even military repercussions.
No matter what the United States decides to do, the Hong Kong we have cherished and celebrated ceased to exist on May 22, 2020.
I haven’t followed this story closely, but I’m wondering why anyone would be surprised to see China treat Hong Kong no differently than the rest of China.
Time to end Hong Kong’s special trade and business status. Bring in Hong Kongese (properly vetted) into the USA and throw out the Communist Chinese. Boycott, Divest and Sanction Communist China.
Remember Communist China is about ready to place a defense zone in the West Philippines Sea (South China Sea - for yoh Communists), effectively blocking all Pacific-bound trade from the Middle East, India and most of SE Asia to the USA
A treaty signed decades ago.
Now renounced by the Red Chinese.
I look for relocations from HK this year.
They figured this is a great time to act with the rest of the world distracted.
“Beijing’s action on Hong Kong this week puts the HRDA to a real test. If the United States doesn’t follow through on the act to revoke Hong Kong’s special treatment, Beijing will treat the act as a paper tiger and may be emboldened to take aggressive actions against Taiwan. If the United States does follow through on the act and revoke Hong Kong’s special treatment, Beijing will retaliate and the U.S.-China relationship will fall to a historical low, which will likely lead to many unforeseen economic, political, and even military repercussions.
No matter what the United States decides to do, the Hong Kong we have cherished and celebrated ceased to exist on May 22, 2020.”
I figured as much, but who signed the treaty? It seems like every English-speaking country around the world is filled with Hong Kong expatriates who fled from that place years ago because they knew what was coming. Why would anyone stay there?
“I haven’t followed this story closely, but I’m wondering why anyone would be surprised to see China treat Hong Kong no differently than the rest of China?
The part of your statement before the common explains the part after the comma. Were it not for the first part you might understand why anyone would be surprised.
And while surprised altogether maybe no one should be, for even if Beijing had kept the promises made for the full fifty years, that fifty years would have come to their natural end.
Maybe some measure of legitimate “surprise” is to “why NOW”, at this time.
For that we’d need to summon a Chinese tea leaf reader who can discern the inner mind of the politburo in Beijing.
Wish they made good movies again.
The Chinese are building two “replacement” cities just in case.
And to make matters more intense, Taiwan has reportedly said they will come down on the side of Hong Kong against the commies if worse comes to worse there. It’s not hard to see the situation in Hong Kong widening to include Taiwan.
Wars and rumors of wars.
Without Hong Kong as a banking gateway, the ability of the US to pay for Chinese goods drops to a minimal level.
Many may think this sounds good, but given the number of Americans employed in businesses dependent on Chinese imports, it will just have the effect of making a huge part of those COVID-19 job losses permanent. Not something even Trump can allow in an election year.
Expect a number of “strongly worded statements” followed by no particular changes. You have to be economically independent before picking the big fights, and Trump hasn’t had enough time or help yet to undo the decades of Chamber of Commerce damage.
That’s what happens when you give up your guns and your freedoms.
Just how long did anyone expect the CCP would allow Hong Kong liberties not allowed on the mainland? Does anyone really believe the British government actually thought the CCP would give Hong Kong 50 years?
The PRC has demonstrated for decades that they will promise anything then do as they please.
For much the same reason people stayed in Rhodesia.
They call communist-run “totalitarian” countries for a good reason: They want it all (as in the whole world, if they could get it).
This is the PRC and some allies like Democrats that collaborated with them, against the world. If they don’t pay a terrible price, they will be the new superpower on the planet.
but I’m wondering why anyone would be surprised to see China treat Hong Kong no differently than the rest of China.
Remember back in '97 when Hong Kong was returned to China and the US media covered and celebrated the event like it was something really good?
I remember watching that and thinking, WTF?
If I were POTUS I’d announce the granting, without application needed, of U.S. citizenship to any Hong Kong citizen that wants it.
Something I do expect to see, is tons of Hong Kong people going to Taiwan. Taiwan may as much as invite them.
I wouldn’t invite all of HK to come over here. Most of them are not protestor activists and would wind up voting Dem. We already have so many Asians here that Auburn University’s faculty, grad-assistants, and students make it look like The University of Alabama at Shanghai.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.