Posted on 05/10/2020 12:25:52 PM PDT by CJ Wolf
boom
Trump has seen, or been apprised of, the tranche of documents delivered by the DNI.
Perhaps he has also seen the documentation, claimed by Ty Clevenger to positively exist— https://www.scribd.com/document/460698548/Letter-from-Attorney-Ty-Clevenger-to-Acting-DNI-Richard-Grenell#from_embed —proving that Seth Rich downloaded the information from the democrat’s server. That would establish that all of Obama & Co. knew that the whole Russian collusion thing was a complete fraud from the get go.
So Obama WH wiretapped Trump Tower after all?
X22report youtube channel thinks that Obama or Hillary will be the first one arrested. Could be wishful thinking. Lets see what happens. Get out the popcorn.
yep, other things I think too.
what is Obamagate?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Depends on who you ask.
The President is focused on the final crimes of the Kenyaneisan Usurpation that targeted him, but the bigger picture is that both parties colluded to violate the Constitution.
Obama was what the founders tried to prevent with the natural born citizen requirement.
A foreigner in the Oval Office.
An enemy agent as Commander in Chief.
The total list of crimes committed is quite lengthy.
“DJT is not a grammar school dropout...”
Yes - He is a graduate of Wheaton Business School, University of Pennsylvania, Ivy League.
The left’s propaganda machine laughed at President Trump for his tweet early on that he had been “wired tapped”. President Trump was 100% correct about having been spied upon. Obama’s involvement in the spying will be proved.
Trump never goes out on a limb ... he is always right in the end. Remember when he said he was spied on?
Samantha Power.
I was thinking that Power would be a soft target to flip, but then I refreshed my knowledge of her background.She's married to Cass Sunstein, who was also in the Obama administration. He's a Harvard and Columbia lawyer, so he'd be a strong protector of his wife.
She was born in London to Irish parents, and naturalized in 1993.
She supports Palestine over Israel, and was the first American UN Ambassador to refuse to block a resolution against Israel.
She was the strongest advocate for the Obama Administration to intervene in Libya, resulting in the death of Khaddaffi.
Her husband Sunstein wrote a 2008 paper on conspiracy theories. From Wikipedia:
Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled "Conspiracy Theories," dealing with the risks and possible government responses to conspiracy theories resulting from "cascades" of faulty information within groups that may ultimately lead to violence. In this article they wrote, "The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government's antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be." They go on to propose that, "the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups",[37] where they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."[37] They refer, several times, to groups that promote the view that the US Government was responsible or complicit in the September 11 attacks as "extremist groups."The authors declare that there are five hypothetical responses a government can take toward conspiracy theories: "We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. (3) Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories. (4) Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech. (5) Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help." However, the authors advocate that each "instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits, and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), (4) and (5)."
Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of recruiting "nongovernmental officials"; they suggest that "government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes," further warning that "too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed."[37] Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, "might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts." This position has been criticized by some commentators[38][39] who argue that it would violate prohibitions on government propaganda aimed at domestic citizens.[40] Sunstein and Vermeule's proposed infiltrations have also been met by sharply critical scholarly critiques.[41][42][43][44]
When reading my bolded portions of the Sunstein paper, doesn't it seem to be the blueprint for the entire Obama conspiracy against Trump?
We have:
- The claim that Russian bots infiltrated Facebook and planted disinformation during the election.
- The hiring of Steele to prepare the Trump disinformation dossier.
- Hiding the Clinton and DNC involvement behind Perkins Coie, who fronted to Steele.
- Using the American media to offer the "independent rebuttal" against the Trump administration's claims of a witch hunt.
Now I think that both Power and Sunstein were deep into the planning of the whole thing, based on Sunstein's own paper on the subject.
Power's name was used to illegally unmask hundreds of American citizens' phone calls with foreigners. I think she's a True Believer who is deep into this conspiracy, and would be willing to go to jail over it.
-PJ
I’ll take “Trump is right again” for 800 Alex...
There is no scandal here - I keep watching the mainstream press and all I am seeing is that Trump is undermining the rule of law by dropping charges against one of his crooked allies. ABCNBCCBSPBSNYSlimesWAComPort wouldn’t withhold information from me, would they?
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department has told a court it did not have enough evidence to justify continued surveillance of one of President Donald Trumps former campaign advisers in 2017, in a sign it believes the FBI on occasion went too far when it investigated Russian influence in the 2016 election.
You concern trolls seem to have this vision of a helpless Trump, stumbling around the White House in his bathrobe with the walls closing in, watching "Gorilla wrestling" videos, a hapless victim of all the "smarter" people around him trying to do him in.
Fact is, Trump, a disciple of "Art of War" and schooled in all the Machiavellian and Alinsky tactics of the Left, is perhaps the savviest political operator to ever occupy the White House. When he puts out tweets like this, you can bet that he's got the goods.
We will soon find out - on his schedule.
This may be why they held off screaming about the incident in Georgia. Somehow “they” might claim anything said against Obumo is “racist” even if he committed a treasonous crime. It would not be the first time.
Obummer over-reached past his luck because he vastly underestimated DJT.
Who ordered the hit. I know Podesta said he wanted to make an example of whoever leaked those emails.
It doesn’t matter whether you tweet or not you can click on the link.
Good catch! Wow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.