Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Army is tripling the power of one of its vehicle-mounted laser systems
Task and Purpose ^ | 8 May 2020 | JARED KELLER

Posted on 05/08/2020 10:42:19 AM PDT by BeauBo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Looks like lasers are on track to take a significant step up in capability, to become more strategic weapons, for missile defense. It will take a few more years though.

The article states: "These efforts could prove especially useful for the Navy, which faces not just the persistent threat of incoming RAM and UAS threats but power generation shortfalls when it comes to the requisite laser output needed to defeat them.

As Task & Purpose previously reported, the Navy's standard High-Energy Laser with Integrated Optical Dazzler And Surveillance (HELIOS) weapons system currently tops out at roughly 150 kw, far below the threshold for defeating a hardened cruise missile."

Perhaps a fleet of robot ships could accompany a Carrier group, to defeat missile wave attacks. CWIS could potentially be replaced with a "bottomless magazine" laser weapon, more resistant to being overwhelmed by sheer numbers of incoming missiles.


1 posted on 05/08/2020 10:42:19 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

A smart entrepreneur would now be designing and manufacturing
laser proof goggles which can protect the eyes of troops and air force pilots from these upgraded laser units.


2 posted on 05/08/2020 10:45:24 AM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Go look at the power consumption per shot numbers. Note that the Navy under Obama cancelled all their advanced power generation projects to save their precious LCS and DDG1000s.

We won’t be seeing a rapid-fire CIWS laser system any time soon.


3 posted on 05/08/2020 10:47:06 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Candor7 wrote: “A smart entrepreneur would now be designing and manufacturing laser proof goggles which can protect the eyes of troops and air force pilots from these upgraded laser units.”

It’s not clear that googles would protect eyeballs when the laser can defeat hardened cruise missiles.


4 posted on 05/08/2020 10:48:06 AM PDT by DugwayDuke ("A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

5 posted on 05/08/2020 10:50:15 AM PDT by Bommer (I am a MAGA-Deplorian! It is the way! It is the only way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Um.... a direct hit from a 150 kilowatt laser will melt your skin and ash your clothing. Eye protection is the least of your problems.


6 posted on 05/08/2020 10:50:22 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

It’s not clear that googles would protect eyeballs when the laser can defeat hardened cruise missiles.>>>>>>>

I agree. That’s why better goggles are needed: laser diffusion lenses.


7 posted on 05/08/2020 10:51:12 AM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

The goggles would be to protect troops from reflections, not a direct hit.


8 posted on 05/08/2020 10:51:27 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Um.... a direct hit from a 150 kilowatt laser will melt your skin and ash your clothing. Eye protection is the least of your problems.

I agree.

A 5 inch shell will blow your head off but the Army couldn’t make proper ear/hearing protectors for those in the vicinity.

Better googles. Needed.

But maybe ou are right. We have soldiers stupid enough who will stand right in front of those units.( sarc.)


9 posted on 05/08/2020 10:54:35 AM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Put another way - a 10 kilowatt laser at close range will cut a hole clear through your hand in less than a second. This is the range used to cut steel on a table in industry. Something 15 times more powerful? Yeah, goggles not going to help.


10 posted on 05/08/2020 10:55:44 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Tell me again how you diffuse the entire spectrum of visible and invisible light without obscuring organic vision?


11 posted on 05/08/2020 10:56:30 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Tylenol then?


12 posted on 05/08/2020 10:58:21 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
America’s enemies are already working on countermeasures.


13 posted on 05/08/2020 11:01:49 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Electronic periscope googles with diffuser lenses mounted in an insulated face shield. Night vision capable.


14 posted on 05/08/2020 11:02:29 AM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

15 posted on 05/08/2020 11:06:16 AM PDT by Karma_Sherab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

Lol

I read somewhere that laser doesn’t emit a color. So that means everything is Star wars and Star trek was fake?


16 posted on 05/08/2020 11:07:24 AM PDT by dp0622 (Radicals, racists dloont point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

“Go look at the power consumption per shot numbers... We won’t be seeing a rapid-fire CIWS laser system any time soon.”

I guess that truck mounted versions contain their power supply as well, so roughly that weight and cubic volume might be bolted to the deck of Naval ships, container ships, barges and/or robotic follower ships. Perhaps if we can’t get a high enough rate of fire from one, we could get enough more firing as a team, to achieve the desired effect.

Of course, nuclear power sources would be the closest thing to real “bottomless magazine”.


17 posted on 05/08/2020 11:18:58 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

> I read somewhere that laser doesn’t emit a color. <

They don’t. Whenever I demonstrated a laser to a class, I would sprinkle chalk dust along the path of the laser to make it visible.

I have written many angry and complaining letters to the Star Trek people in that regard. So far, no response.


18 posted on 05/08/2020 11:20:35 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

The navy seems like a good fit for lasers, if they can install a sufficient power source.


19 posted on 05/08/2020 11:29:53 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
pffft- more impressed with lazer sharks


20 posted on 05/08/2020 11:33:25 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson