Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Candor7

“Forearm owners?” LOL! For a moment there, I thought the Canadian government might have hilariously screwed up its banning decree. But, just a typo.

When I saw the patronizing “Deserve Better Than Thoughts and Prayers” announcement by Premier Trudeau, I thought that Canadian firearm owners were probably wishing they had their own 5th Amendment style guarantee of firearm ownership. US experience with it isn’t perfect but it does create a fundamental right the government must justify encroaching on.


4 posted on 05/02/2020 3:34:22 AM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Captain Rhino

Sorry about the mispelling of “firearm.”

I do not believe Canadian law abiding firearm owners will comply with this ban.

New Zealand had to walk their ban back.Canada is apparently following the New Zealand model of buy back.

I have spoken to several AR-15 owners here in Canada. None of us will voluntarily comply with this “ban” without a court hearubg or a court order. This ban is “retroactive legislation,” and according to Canadian jurisprudence, a law or regulation cannot extinguish property rights already granted. They can change current and future rights to acquire such firearms, but hey can’t make people give them up, other than voluntarily.

Huge Civil Disobedience coming in Canada.


6 posted on 05/02/2020 3:44:34 AM PDT by Candor7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Captain Rhino

At least it wasn’t foreskin owners!

That would SURELY raise some eyebrows!


11 posted on 05/02/2020 4:09:05 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson