BTW, folks. I got a lot of heat from readers who called me a despicable liar for claiming that Covid-19’s mortality is no more serious than a deadly season of the flu.
I NEVER SAID THAT. If you disagree with the doctors who claim this ( see this article ), direct your arguments against them, NOT ME.
This is what FR is for — the free exchange of ideas.
The doctor missed the point if he though the lockdown was about reducing deaths.
The lockdown had one purpose - managing workflow at the hospitals. In that it worked - lots of empty hospital beds. But in the long run, lockdown won’t save lives or prevent anyone from getting the disease.
Here’s the full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5GDPCUUBEE
This thing is really making the rounds from a bunch of “re-distributor” publications and channels. It’s good that it is going viral. It needs to.
And the whole thing is worth your time. Grab a cup of coffee.
Here’s the logic: Since COVID-19, the flu, and the common cold are all viruses, then taking anti-virus measures to stop VOID-19 would also reduce the flu and common cold, but they didn’t.
This means these silly and useless measures did not stop COVID-19 and the results we see we would have seen without the lockdowns.
These guys are gonna get kicked out of Cali if they keep talking like this
I sure miss Hockey Stick McGee.../s
Lockdown versus non-lockdown did not produce a statistically different number of deaths.
And how did they come to that deduction crystal ball
California Docs are like California judges