Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evidence That the Virus Is Much Less Deadly Than People Feared Weakens the Case for Maintaining Lockdowns
Townhall.com ^ | April 22, 2020 | Jacob Sullum

Posted on 04/22/2020 10:27:30 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: HamiltonJay

>>The lockdowns are bullspit at this point... outside the accela corridore and a few other places, the country should be business as usual... But nope... This whole thing is politcal.

The WHO used to agree with you not that many years ago:

“However, as they would hamper global travel and trade, such restrictions are not recommended by WHO once the global spread of pandemic influenza is established.”

https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/92/12/14-135590/en/

Travel restrictions were included in the WHO interim protocol: rapid operations to contain the initial emergence of pandemic influenza that was published in 2007 by the World Health Organization (WHO).1

However, as they would hamper global travel and trade, such restrictions are not recommended by WHO once the global spread of pandemic influenza is established.

In 2009, some countries applied travel restrictions as one of several strategies to prevent the introduction of the influenza virus A(H1N1)pdm09 into their territories but the effectiveness of this approach has subsequently been questioned....


41 posted on 04/22/2020 1:57:01 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The fish wrap media promoted Obama's Benghazi lies in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would like to see some peer reviews of this study, if true it’s certainly good news.


42 posted on 04/22/2020 2:34:49 PM PDT by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This can’t be right

everyone is telling me I’m wrong....

Let America Go Back to Work!!!


43 posted on 04/22/2020 2:57:07 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“the study’s results raises a question that policymakers across the country will confront as they consider when and how to loosen sweeping restrictions aimed at curtailing the COVID-19 epidemic. Will they be guided by emerging evidence, or will they use it to support the policies they already favored? “

Neither. There will be massive civil disobedience, and the “policy makers” will back off if they know what’s good for them.


44 posted on 04/22/2020 3:56:37 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 ("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous; Wuli

I think you are both leaving out the people who may be ‘infected’ by the Novel Coronavirus 2019 but have no reaction to it. Some people have a natural ‘resistance’ to certain diseases.


45 posted on 04/22/2020 4:11:19 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; Wuli

There is no resistance without antibodies. These antibodies show up in the tests being given - no?


46 posted on 04/22/2020 4:23:14 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

No argument.


47 posted on 04/22/2020 4:27:03 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

“There is no resistance without antibodies. These antibodies show up in the tests being given - no?”

No and yes.

There are two types of test.

The tests when they say someone tests positive for the Wuhan Virus are not looking for antibodies. They are looking specifically for signs of an active virus, not for any antibodies that might be developing to fight it.

The antibody test is a separate test usually given to just those not known to be Wuhan Virus positive and or those who have recovered from an illness from it.


48 posted on 04/22/2020 4:33:00 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Wuli; UCANSEE2
No and yes.

Let me ask the question a little differently and more directly. Is a body's ability to 'resist' a virus possible without at least some antibodies already present in the body's immune system, or created by the body upon attack from a new virus; a previously unknown virus, like the coronavirus?

Btw, you said you had no argument with UCANSEE2's statement, part of which was:

Some people have a natural ‘resistance’ to certain diseases.

To which I replied, "There is no resistance without antibodies. These antibodies show up in the tests being given - no?"

So either the answer to my question is true, or false. It can possibly be, "both", as you have said - no?

49 posted on 04/22/2020 4:59:44 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Read the Wikipedia article on phagocytes.


50 posted on 04/22/2020 5:11:13 PM PDT by BDParrish ( Please correct me! I never learned anything from anybody who already agreed with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

“Yesterday, the rate of new infections in 23 states was less than 3% of total infections since the epidemic started”

Kinda blows the exponential aspect of infection and death all to hell doesn’t it?

Except there is the antibody explosion so maybe we’ll actually get an exponential event.


51 posted on 04/22/2020 6:23:11 PM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

No, I do not think that all antibodies are pathogen specific, nor that the body has to have experienced a particular pathogen for its immune system to rally a successful defense against it. But yes, after successfully defending against an attack the immune system may have some specific antibodies, in spite of defeating the attack initially without them.

The immune system is not a system designed to only be successful against previously known pathogens. It is a system that is designed to develop strategies to attack the unknown new attackers. Some folks have immune systems that do that better than others in some cases.


52 posted on 04/22/2020 6:26:59 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hate to threadbomb but I’m in several of the vulnerable categories and I say reopen everything. Now.


53 posted on 04/22/2020 6:30:33 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous
There is no resistance without antibodies.

Can you explain why I haven't had the flu for 37 years? Do I have antibodies to every new strain of the flu that comes along every single year? Where did I get them?

Why haven't I had a cold for the last 47 years? Do I have antibodies to every new strain of rhinovirus and the 8 strains of coronavirus that cause colds in millions of people every year?

54 posted on 04/22/2020 6:46:25 PM PDT by TigersEye (MAGA - 16 more years! - KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
There is no one reason. There could be a number of factors such as how much you're exposed to others, outdoors, what food you consume, genetics, and etc. You obviously have a great immune system. Research how the immune system works, how it can rapidly produce antibodies even for new pathogens. I've read how much of a viral load you receive at the time of an infection plays a role in how much you will be affected when infected. The theory being your body doesn't have as much time to produce antibodies to combat the virus. Maybe you're just blessed...:)
55 posted on 04/22/2020 7:35:31 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I fear its more about the Deep State finding a way to get socialist control of us than it is about protecting us.

Why are we being locked down when there are ways to fight virus and bacteria ? Disenfectant sprays and ultra violet light are not being deployed.

only socialist style lockdowns

56 posted on 04/22/2020 7:46:14 PM PDT by KTM rider ( .......than to post and remove all doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

I’m no expert by any stretch, but I believe the body maintains what scientists call memory antibodies which are specific?


57 posted on 04/22/2020 7:52:53 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is the whole thing, real and as bad as it is, simply a Communist Chinese and Democrat psy-op to defeat Trump?


58 posted on 04/22/2020 7:53:08 PM PDT by comps4spice (Progressivism is a threat to life and liberty in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amorphous

Your reply is fair enough but it means that your statement about antibodies is not the absolute you made it sound like. Perhaps you didn’t mean it to be.

It’s a complicated subject where absolutes are a rare thing.


59 posted on 04/22/2020 7:56:28 PM PDT by TigersEye (MAGA - 16 more years! - KAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
My understanding is your body will absolutely create antibodies specific to the antigen. As I said, I don't have a MD or even a PHD, but my DIL is an MD - maybe I could ask her - unless someone more knowledgeable will enlighten us all. :)

Immune Response:

https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/immune+response

60 posted on 04/22/2020 8:09:49 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson