Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump: What’s up, Doc?
American Thinker.com ^ | April 19, 2020 | Clarice Feldman

Posted on 04/19/2020 5:43:02 AM PDT by Kaslin

A Facebook friend likened the President to Bugs Bunny, chomping on his carrot and making fun of his enemies. And this week it certainly seems that way as the page flips from "everybody’s–an-epidemiology expert" to "we are now all constitutional scholars."

On April 14 Trump said he was the “absolute authority” on when to relax the shutdown and two days later, based on fact, he noted that the virus seemed to have peaked, circumstances were different in different places of the country, and it was up to the governors of each state to determine mitigation strategies appropriate for their states following some national guidelines.

The new guidelines are aimed at easing restrictions in areas with low transmission of the coronavirus, while holding the line in harder-hit locations. They make clear that the return to normalcy will be a far longer process than Trump initially envisioned, with federal officials warning that some social distancing measures may need to remain in place through the end of the year to prevent a new outbreak. And they largely reinforce plans already in the works by governors, who have primary responsibility for public health in their states.

"You’re going to call your own shots," Trump told the governors Thursday afternoon in a conference call, according to an audio recording obtained by the Associated Press. "We’re going to be standing alongside of you."

Places with declining infections and strong testing would begin a three-phase gradual reopening of businesses and schools.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coranovirus; covid19; governors; presidenttrump; reopening; shutdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2020 5:43:02 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nice analogy. Bugs was modeled on a cocky and fearless New Yorker.


2 posted on 04/19/2020 5:45:00 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; 5th MEB; Albion Wilde; American in Israel; bitt; BlackAdderess; bobfeland; burghguy; ...

Clarice Feldman ping.

If you'd like to be on or off the Clarice Feldman ping list, usually issued only on Sunday morning, please click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.

3 posted on 04/19/2020 5:49:44 AM PDT by upchuck (Dan Bongino: The Democrats are The Virus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
"Bugs was modeled on a cocky and fearless New Yorker."

Interesting. Who? (Yep, I did a search.)

4 posted on 04/19/2020 5:57:53 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

My guess would be Huntz Hall from the Dead End Kids.


5 posted on 04/19/2020 6:01:54 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Seems like an effective way of setting up the D governors for self destruction. And we ALL get to watch NY MI NJ MN .....and the list goes on.


6 posted on 04/19/2020 6:04:34 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; All

Thanks for posting. Another very good article.

Where Did You Get That Fact?

We are being inundated every day with computational findings, conclusions, and statistics. In op-eds, policy debates, and public discussions numbers are presented with the finality of a slammed door. In fact we need to know how these findings were reached, so we can evaluate their relevance, their credibility, resolve conflicts when they differ and make better decisions. Even figuring out where a number came from is a challenge, let alone trying to understand how it was determined.

The goal of better decision making is behind the current hype surrounding big data, the emergence of “evidence-based” everything—policy,—medicine,—practice,—management, and issues such as climate change, fiscal predictions, health assessment, even what information you are exposed to online. The field of statistics has been addressing the reliability of results derived from data for a long time, with many very successful contributions (for example, confidence intervals, quantifying the distribution of model errors, and the concept of robustness).

The scientific method suggests skepticism when interpreting conclusions, and a responsibility to communicate scientific findings transparently, so others may evaluate and understand the result. We need to bring these notions into our everyday expectations when presented with new computational results. We should be able to dig in and find out where the statistics came from, how they were computed, and why we should believe them. Those concepts receive almost no consideration when findings are publicly communicated.

Victoria Stodden

Associate Professor of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/23794


7 posted on 04/19/2020 6:14:43 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
President Trump: "Our country is in the midst of a great national trial, unlike any we have ever faced before. [...] We’re at war with a deadly virus. Success in this fight will require the full absolute measure of our collective strength, love, and devotion. It’s very important. Each of us has the power through our own choices and actions to save American lives and rescue the most vulnerable among us"

Pearl Harbor American Military killed: More than 2,300 killed!

9/11 fatalities: 2,996!

38,664 Deaths in America from the novel coronavirus in the United States! (Fox News, 19 April 2020)


8 posted on 04/19/2020 6:19:03 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Are the ChiComs, their blatant ownership of America, fake news media/CNN, the real Deep Staters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
Her admonishments smack entirely too much of good sense and actual scientific discipline.

As a result, she may very likely soon find herself  ex-Associate Professor of Information Sciences

9 posted on 04/19/2020 6:20:01 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

‘My guess would be Huntz Hall from the Dead End Kids.’

my guess would be Leo Gorcey; Hall played the goofy one...


10 posted on 04/19/2020 6:28:26 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Please put me on list.

Thank you.


11 posted on 04/19/2020 6:28:58 AM PDT by Fishtalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

‘and the list goes on.’

add PA and NC...


12 posted on 04/19/2020 6:30:28 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

You are right.

I suppose this makes Biden Porky Pig?


13 posted on 04/19/2020 6:35:41 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
The scientific method suggests skepticism when interpreting conclusions, and a responsibility to communicate scientific findings transparently, so others may evaluate and understand the result.

The scientific method also suggests even stronger skepticism of skeptics rejecting data as flowed because it does not fit their own ill-supported hypothesis, ill-supported because they are too lazy, incompetent or ill-equipped to go get their own data.

And the scientific method kicks to the curb the kinds of frauds we see around here who support their own preferred hypothesis by advancing data that must exist to refute present data and would exist if only the people taking the data weren't so biased against their own - the skeptics - preferred hypothesis.

Skepticism is fine, but hypothesized fraud is, well, fraud.

14 posted on 04/19/2020 6:40:38 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Satch from the Bowery Boys? I would’ve guessed Slip. He seemed always so cocksure and a bit of an act...


15 posted on 04/19/2020 6:52:20 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Could you please add the verified deaths to standard flu to that list, and annual deaths by abortion to that list, just for a sense of perspective?


16 posted on 04/19/2020 7:25:56 AM PDT by _longranger81 (Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves; defend the defenseless; care for the unloved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: _longranger81

Could you please add the verified deaths to standard flu to that list, and annual deaths by abortion to that list, just for a sense of perspective?

I believe that data from Fox is verified data each day.

If you can find the reliable data you want, I can ping you so you and add it on to my posting.’

Dave


17 posted on 04/19/2020 7:44:32 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Are the ChiComs, their blatant ownership of America, fake news media/CNN, the real Deep Staters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“everybody’s–an-epidemiology expert” to “we are now all constitutional scholars.”

Indeed turn to any news station the left like.


18 posted on 04/19/2020 10:31:53 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

You mean it’s not “established science?”


19 posted on 04/19/2020 10:48:44 AM PDT by gogeo (It isn't just time to open America up again: It's time to be America again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
The scientific method also suggests even stronger skepticism of skeptics rejecting data as flowed because it does not fit their own ill-supported hypothesis, ill-supported because they are too lazy, incompetent or ill-equipped to go get their own data.

Really? Show us where. So far it's Reality 2, Models 0.

20 posted on 04/19/2020 11:37:53 AM PDT by gogeo (It isn't just time to open America up again: It's time to be America again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson