Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elites Hate Phyllis Schlafly Because She Defeated Them From Home With Six Kids In Tow
The Federalist ^ | Colleen Holmes Holcomb

Posted on 04/13/2020 11:36:19 AM PDT by Kaslin

Unable to defeat Schlafly in life, cultural elites in Hollywood are now attacking her posthumously in the brazenly dishonest 'Mrs. America' series.>


Liberal cultural elites have had it out for Phyllis Schlafly since she defeated the Equal Rights Amendment in 1979. Now, producers of the FX/Hulu series “Mrs. America” have hypocritically done to Schlafly exactly what the women’s liberation and Me Too movements complain “the patriarchy” does to women it cannot control: rape and defile them.

The so-called Equal Rights Amendment, or ERA, was a perfect Hollywood cause. It allowed supporters to appear pro-woman, while Hollywood knew the amendment posed no threat to the elite power structure. ERA is touted as an effort to “put women in the Constitution” and ensure women’s equality. Hollywood elites jumped on board supporting ratification, and once the amendment passed Congress in 1972, 32 states passed ratification bills in rapid succession.

Enter Phyllis Schlafly, a Harvard University-educated, anti-communist crusader, who chose to get married and raise her six children instead of pursuing a paid career. Schlafly became a cultural villain when she inconveniently read the ERA and its proponents’ writings.

How Phyllis Schlafly Killed the ERA

Using supporters’ own words and scholarship, Schlafly exposed the stark nakedness of the feminist emperor that is the ERA. She proved that the amendment has never held any benefit for women that was not already deeply entrenched in American law, and that it would not put women in the Constitution, as it refers only to “sex,” the definition of which has no consensus these days. Schlafly discerned that the ERA would negatively affect women by subjecting them to the draft and removing important protections that would disproportionately harm lower- and middle-class women.

Schlafly trained a team of volunteers, many of them homemakers who had never done public speaking or worked outside the home, to debate ERA supporters on college campuses and local television stations, and to lobby their state houses.

Schlafly not only exposed the truth about the ERA, she exposed a reality most distasteful to feminists and cultural elites: Many women actually love their husbands, enjoy their marriages, and consider it an honor rather than a burden to raise children.

Far more women were concerned about being forced into the workforce or having their daughters drafted than were interested in demanding abortion rights and other feminist priorities embedded in the ERA. Even worse, Schlafly empowered and equipped these women, whom feminists scorned and judged as inferior, to beat feminists at their own game.

Cultural elites are still fuming that Schlafly was able to do more with a typewriter, a bullhorn, and an army of housewives than they were able to do with all their intelligence, political power, and the support of cast members from every Norman Lear sitcom on the primetime lineup.

While Schlafly and her team, armed with facts and statistics, motivated by principle and deeply held religious beliefs, wrote thank-you notes and delivered baked goods to supportive legislators, ERA supporters chose a different approach. They indulged dramatic guerilla tactics, such as chaining themselves to legislative buildings. They wrote ERA-opposing legislators’ names in chicken blood on the marble floors, while angrily demanding passage.

Once Schlafly and her team came onto the scene, the ERA train that was on a smooth and certain course to ratification came to a screeching halt. When the statutory deadline for ratification passed in 1979, not only had no more states ratified ERA, but five had rescinded their previous ratification. The ERA was dead.

Schlafly Was the Victor, Not the Victim

In recent years and the wake of the Me Too movement, instead of catalyzing outrage over decades of mistreatment and unifying women to fight actual victimization by crusading against sex trafficking or assisting women abroad who face all manner of political, economic, and physical oppression, the American women’s movement has channeled its intellectual and star power into little more than a seance by demanding ratification of the long-dead ERA and reopening wounds from ERA’s defeat. Hollywood is looking for revenge.

Unable to defeat Schlafly in life, cultural elites in Hollywood are now attacking her posthumously. A recent episode of the Netflix series “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel” initially honors Schlafly for having the courage to run for Congress as a young mother in 1952. But the episode then quickly moves to falsely accuse Schlafly of being an antisemite. In truth, Schlafly was never accused of being antisemitic. In fact, she was even criticized by some for being highly ecumenical and a strong supporter of Israel.

The most recent example of Hollywood’s effort to avenge the ERA is “Mrs. America,” set to premiere April 15. This series perpetrates the ultimate act of Hollywood imposing its will on Schlafly, casting her in a role she would never consider playing and urged all women to reject: the victim.

“Mrs. America” portrays Schlafly as the consummate victim, persecuted by her own conservative ideology and even by God, as she desperately inquires of her priest why God “put this fire in her” to fight a political battle — as if it were wrong to do so. They show her belittled by the chauvinist men in the conservative movement, and oppressed, scolded, and even raped by her own husband.

The characterization is intentionally false and would be laughable if it weren’t so patently offensive. Schlafly biographer Don Critchlow — who, in addition to interviewing Schlafly, her family, and associates, had full access to her archives, financial records, correspondence, and family letters — called the series’ depiction of Schlafly’s marriage, “So inaccurate, it’s absolutely shocking.”

Producers never bothered to ask family members or any of the hundreds of living people who actually knew Schlafly about her real experiences, her true character, and her marriage. Instead of risking pushback by depicting any of Schlafly’s supporters who are still alive, producers went the cowardly route, choosing to create fictional characters bearing the names of only deceased ERA opponents.

Had producers bothered to ask, women might learn that Schlafly was respected and treasured in her marriage and the conservative movement, but the cultural elites couldn’t risk letting that word get out. If they had asked her daughter, their caricature of Schlafly and her husband sharing a bedroom but maintaining separate twin beds would be shattered in favor of the reality that the couple shared a bed and that Schlafly drew great strength, fulfillment, and liberation from her marriage.

Regardless of your stance on the ERA or your opinion about Schlafly, any intellectually honest viewer should be outraged by “Mrs. America.” Love her or hate her, Schlafly was a formidable woman who empowered, inspired, and gave a voice to the forgotten women of her generation.

She defeated the most powerful political movement of the 1970s and raised up one of the nation’s most robust movements to date. She paved the way for countless strong, pro-family, female voices on the public stage. Depicting her as a subjugated pawn and victim is yet another act of anti-woman aggression from Hollywood.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: era; feminism; fx; hollywood; hulu; metoo; mrsamerica; phyllisschlafly; sex; television; tmmm; tv; womensrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 04/13/2020 11:36:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Schlafly was the real “Feminist”

There’s nothing feminine about “feminism”, just a bunch of women who want to be men.


2 posted on 04/13/2020 11:38:15 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

...defeated the ERA and the left with people like you assisting every step of the way.


3 posted on 04/13/2020 11:39:11 AM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Or can’t get a man.


4 posted on 04/13/2020 11:40:24 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sport

Lesbos ran the Feminist movement from the beginning.


5 posted on 04/13/2020 11:41:05 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
A recent episode of the Netflix series “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel” initially honors Schlafly for having the courage to run for Congress as a young mother in 1952. But the episode then quickly moves to falsely accuse Schlafly of being an anti-Semite

Pretty sure it's Amazon Prime, not Netflix. Sloppy reporting however Phyliss was fabulous.

6 posted on 04/13/2020 11:43:37 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

She turned out to be a prophet. Every prediction she made had come to pass, right down to men in the women’s rest rooms.


7 posted on 04/13/2020 11:43:48 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I agree.


8 posted on 04/13/2020 11:44:03 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Feminists have argued that women can “have it all”. But if women like Schlafly or Sarah Palin are presented, the Feminists spew nothing but hate. The feminists hate children and marriage. They don’t want women to be women — they want women to be men. Because feminists don’t like women. Or men. Or children.


9 posted on 04/13/2020 11:46:36 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Amazon Prime. I did not even finish the series do that underhanded attack on a real leader. I knew the real truth behind the story.


10 posted on 04/13/2020 11:49:25 AM PDT by Destroyer Sailor (Revenge is a dish best served cold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Amazon Prime. I did not even finish the series do that underhanded attack on a real leader. I knew the real truth behind the story.


11 posted on 04/13/2020 11:49:50 AM PDT by Destroyer Sailor (Revenge is a dish best served cold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

[[There’s nothing feminine about “feminism”, just a bunch of women who want to be men.]]

And turn men into women


12 posted on 04/13/2020 11:50:24 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is long ... but captivatingly so .... Please take the time to watch it all the way through and pass it on to others that can .... and will ....... . https://youtu.be/MY8Nfzcn1qQ


13 posted on 04/13/2020 11:52:53 AM PDT by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I loved and respected her. She had guts!!! RIP Dear Lady


14 posted on 04/13/2020 11:57:07 AM PDT by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Phyllis Schlafly was an amazing woman. I had my first introduction to her as a college sophomore when I decided to write for the campus newspaper. As part of that job, I went to the initial recruiting meetings of both College Democrats and Republicans and came to the quick conclusion that while it would be easier to get laid with the Democrats, they were nasty and angry, certainly not good marriage material and were as likely as not to give you an STD if you did get laid.

The Republican gals were sweet, like a sister or a favorite cousin. I would never consider doing anything disrespectful toward them because they were respectable ladies. This was 1974 and the state I was attending college (Idaho) had just been one of those stampeded into passing the ERA but, thanks to Phyllis Schlafly and the girls I met in that organization, they were in the process of rescinding it.

The people in charge were telling them they couldn't rescind it. Now, my political IQ then was a lot lower than it is now, so I thought "Wait a minute! We rescinded and repealed prohibition, didn't we?" I wrote an editorial, which my daughter discovered over 30 years later while working on the newspaper in the same university.

I thought it was pretty good for a college sophomore and it got me burned in effigy outside the campus newspaper office by some of the same women who I'd met at the Young Democrats recruiting meetings just a week or two earlier. A month or so later, the Mormon Church came out against it as well and, since their members make up somewhere between a quarter and a third of the Idaho electorate, that pretty much made rescinding it a done deal.

Phyllis Schlafly and her army of housewives and the nicer college girls has stopped the stampede. It is a moment in history, although a few more years would pass before it finally died, that I will never forget.

15 posted on 04/13/2020 11:58:28 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

There’s nothing feminine about “feminism”, just a bunch of women who want to be men.

And more than a few have achieved that......in the looks department......;)


16 posted on 04/13/2020 12:00:21 PM PDT by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Feminism is all about being a victim. Being an intelligent, faith based, critically thinking and armed woman is all about not being a victim.


17 posted on 04/13/2020 12:06:23 PM PDT by jmacusa (If we're all equal how is diversity our strength?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman; flaglady47
Fellow Illinoisan Phyllis Schlafly and I became acquaintances through our work in the state's anti-ERA movement. A beautiful lady and a patriot through and through.

She was a friend of Free Republic and attended our Managers Banquet in DC. I last spoke with her in the pre-Banquet hotel cocktail room where she quietly charmed and impressed everyone in the room.

She was a great American.

Leni

18 posted on 04/13/2020 12:34:15 PM PDT by MinuteGal (MAGA !!! MAGA !!! MAGA !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Thanks for sharing. I never had the honor of meeting Phyllis Schlafly, but I attended a conference once where she delivered a televised message.

While she was an extraordinary woman, she was very down-to-earth and spoke from the heart, making most of us think of our Moms or a favorite Aunt.

19 posted on 04/13/2020 1:08:39 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Lesbos ran the Feminist movement from the beginning.
xxxxxxx

Actually it was co-opted by the radicals.

The women who then left the movement started Feminists for Life.


20 posted on 04/13/2020 1:26:41 PM PDT by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson