I think the global shutdown and widespread isolation is overdone,
county by county rules, based on #cases/100,000 would be better
low incidence (low mobility/rural) should be handled very differently
than high incidence (high mobility/city)
just as WVa has low case load burden,
and New York has high case load burden.
The one size fits all approach unnecessarily impacts low risk populations,
and are insufficient for severely effected areas
Current “policies” (i.e., decrees) seem to be lacking any sense of proportionality in either a geographical context or with respect to consideration of a long history of disease outbreaks and other kinds of recurring death metrics in this country.
We now have an outbreak of economic illness with its own set of potentially disasterous consequences.
“the global shutdown and widespread isolation is overdone,
county by county rules, based on #cases/100,000 would be better”
Within each county, there could be different levels of protections, rather than just an all or none approach.
Masks, sanitizer/hand washing, back to the 10 or less rule, etc. Allow all businesses to open, except a few specified to remain closed, etc.