Posted on 03/27/2020 10:10:24 AM PDT by kevcol
'To clarify, $1200 checks are ONLY going to some w/social sec numbers, NOT immigrants w/ tax IDs (ITINs),' the freshman Democrat from New York wrote in a tweet on Thursday.
'Thanks to GOP, these checks will be cut off the backs of *taxpaying immigrants,* who get nothing. Many are essential workers who pay more taxes than Amazon,' she continued.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
NOT immigrants w/ tax IDs (ITINs)
“Wish that were tru, but as usual shes lying.....”
I see no benefit for her lying, so the alternative is that she is dumber than a rock and has no clue what she voted for. Her Aides, the brains of the operation, asleep at the wheel.
Memo to AOC
Pound sand!
You can use a TIN = Taxpayer Identification Number.
"We have created in our own society, people who have pretensions about human nature, but they are never subject to the ramifications of their ideology."
Victor Davis Hansen 2/13/2020 Patton: American Ajax
Yes there is mention of 350 million dollars for Immigrant assistance. But it reads.....
” Migration and Refugee Assistance, $350,000,000, to remain available until expended, to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus.
As I mentioned yesterday it specifically speaks to “respond to CORONAVIRUS” Let them argue in Congress for the next five years if that includes cash to the undocumented.
All of its possible, shes an idiot, her staff inept, AND knowing full well her fans wont bother checking and will tweet the BS nonstop, she lies.
Oh so it was removed? OK good to know..how about funding for NPR and PBS is that still in there?
She should tell those illegals to get their money from trees since banks have branches.
The one’s with multiple s.s. #’s will balance it out.
>>>NOT immigrants w/ tax IDs (ITINs)<<<
Documented or Undocumented “Immigrants”?
How does anyone without a Green Card get a Tax ID #?
Oh man, that woman is evil.
I thought the Dems controlled the house. Obviously, Annoying Occasionally-Coherent didn’t get the message.
“Unfortunately, the LSM keeps talking about the octogenarian’s “great” bill, without bothering to mention that 98% of her pipe dreams have been 86’d.”
How true Ratman, how true.
They can always go back home.
It was never in the Senate bill. Sheesh.
Not for one second did anyone take Pelosi’s bill seriously...
which is why she abandoned it
Is that why AOC was having a 5 year old hissy fit on the floor
Oh, f**k off, you ditz.
Have you ever noticed that welfare never seems to run out of money? People are always carrying on that SS will eventually go bankrupt or this or that will go bankrupt but never welfare.
Why is that so?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.