Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy
I was wondering WHY they picked this specific trash to go through...

The baby died years before DNA became a crime-solving tool. Residents arranged for a funeral and burial and named the boy Andrew, which was inscribed on his gravestone. In 2009, a detective, hoping to use new DNA analysis methods to find a new lead, arranged for the body to be disinterred, according to court documents. But the baby's DNA profile wasn't closely related to any profiles in the state's crime database.

Last year, police turned to investigative genetic genealogy, which seeks DNA links outside of crime databases. Investigators built a family tree that pointed them to Bentaas, according to court documents.


40 posted on 03/15/2020 6:28:38 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie

They used her trash to narrow it down further

New testing showed as you said that her family were likely relatives to the dead baby

How they already had DNA on one of them who knows could be many reasons from crime to hospitals or any other DNA gathering source

Suspecting the mom as the killer is pretty reasonable once you find out who she was ..either her or her family unless she was held hostage by baby killers at the time

The circumstances is definitely more to the story


42 posted on 03/15/2020 8:33:22 AM PDT by wardaddy (I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson