Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie

They used her trash to narrow it down further

New testing showed as you said that her family were likely relatives to the dead baby

How they already had DNA on one of them who knows could be many reasons from crime to hospitals or any other DNA gathering source

Suspecting the mom as the killer is pretty reasonable once you find out who she was ..either her or her family unless she was held hostage by baby killers at the time

The circumstances is definitely more to the story


42 posted on 03/15/2020 8:33:22 AM PDT by wardaddy (I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy
She'll be convicted on the basis of her confession, fortunately. But had she stood her ground with a competent lawyer she could have gotten away with it since DNA evidence has been found NOT the infallable proof it has been regarded. "DNA Evidence is Not Foolproof" from Popular Science and other articles show how a case like this, with a 38 year old sample, could have lost on the "beyond reasonable doubt" point. Just sayin'.

Hope ya'll are well and safe from the creeping crud.

43 posted on 03/15/2020 8:44:29 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (thought we had the Commie's beat. Now we have to do it all over again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson