Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Soccer president resigns after court filing argued women players did not deserve equal pay
CBS "News" ^ | March 12, 2020 | BY VICTORIA ALBERT

Posted on 03/13/2020 6:29:12 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: discostu
When the lawsuit is a discrimination case you HAVE to give reasons why you can legitimately pay one group of people less than another. That's because the facts about the pay differential are not in dispute here (nobody questions the pay structures for men vs. women).

The CBA isn't a factual argument to make that is intended to be weighed by a jury or an arbitrator. The CBA is a legal basis for having the case thrown out entirely (juries don't decide legal matters; judges do). On that point, the defendant in this case basically mounting an affirmative defense that says: "We don't argue with any of the facts that are presented, but the law is clear that a contract between two parties overrides any claims that one party may have against the other about the terms of the contract."

41 posted on 03/13/2020 9:32:52 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
I only disagree with what you've posted there to the extent that it's comprised almost entirely of political/PR points, not legal ones.

This isn't a case like a Chick-fil-A boycott or a Gillette idiocy. It's a lawsuit, not a PR campaign. The USWNT has no real leverage here on the PR side. What are they going to do, tell fans to boycott their own games? Tell fans and sponsors to stop supporting the U.S. Soccer Federation? The organization is a non-profit organization for a sport that most Americans don't care about at that level anyway.

U.S. Soccer's last filing was a public relations disaster. The only thing I can think of is that a bunch of high priced lawyers with no feel either for the game or the larger public context sat around and drafted an "everything including the kitchen sink" brief, thinking that no one except the judge would ever read it.

That's not how legal briefs work. The primary audience for a legal brief is the other party in the lawsuit.

This is Wile E. Coyote level strategizing, and it had the same predictable result. The bomb blew up in their faces. It didn't take a week: Carlos Cordeiro has resigned.

He didn't resign over a stupid legal brief. He resigned for apologizing afterwards -- because his apology probably cost the U.S. Soccer Federation $66 million. How does the president of an organization that is the defendant in a $66 million lawsuit explain himself in a deposition when he publicly apologized for a legal brief that was filed on his organization's behalf?

I'd love to get a copy of that legal brief. It almost certainly has an attestation/certification section with the signature of a U.S. Soccer Federation representative on it. There's a good chance he resigned today because that signature is HIS.

Any half-assed lawyer will tell you that when you're defending yourself against a $66 million lawsuit (or a $66 lawsuit), you're best served by just keeping your 'effing mouth shut in public about any matters related to the litigation. How many times do you read a media story about a case like this, where the person or organization involved simply refers all media questions to their legal counsel?

42 posted on 03/13/2020 9:45:49 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
Sorry for ranting, but USSF's stupidity is aggravating a very complex negotiation.

P.S. -- It's not a negotiation. It's a LAWSUIT! :-)

43 posted on 03/13/2020 9:46:37 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Yeah true. The revenue is though since they go to different competitions with different TV contracts and ticket prices. Last I heard the women were getting a higher percentage of their sport’s revenue than the men. Smaller pie, smaller pay. Pretty easy math.


44 posted on 03/13/2020 9:51:35 AM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The women are waaay overpaid based on the amount of income they generate. They should be paid exactly the same percentage of revenue as men.


45 posted on 03/13/2020 10:01:49 AM PDT by KyCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

Time for a divorce. Let women run their own show like the LPGA does. Then all this bickering will instantly stop.


46 posted on 03/13/2020 10:02:25 AM PDT by Stevenfo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
Here’s an idea: separate into two organizations.

GMTA. That was my exact reaction on reading that the argument about which group brought in more viewers and revenue didn't fly. Separate the organizations; have an umbrella co-ordinator if necessary that isn't involved in the detailed business (training, logistics, TV revenues, etc) if needed.

Like, the WNBA and the NBA. Or, the short-lived Lingerie League and the NFL.

47 posted on 03/13/2020 11:32:00 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

The solution is easy:.. just have one league and the teams pick who they want and pay them what they want.


48 posted on 03/13/2020 1:07:08 PM PDT by willyd (I for one welcome our NSA overlords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Is there a worldwide U13 competition?


49 posted on 03/13/2020 2:39:22 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Clydesdales have more grace than female footballers.


50 posted on 03/13/2020 2:43:18 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack
Is there a worldwide U13 competition?

I don't know. But if there is, I'm quite sure the top teams would destroy the US Women's team.

ML/NJ

51 posted on 03/13/2020 4:50:27 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack
Is there a worldwide U13 competition?

I don't know. But if there is, I'm quite sure the top teams would destroy the US Women's team.

ML/NJ

52 posted on 03/13/2020 4:50:27 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: drop 50 and fire for effect

While it is true woman’s soccer generates more money than men’s soccer it is not true world-wide:

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/about-that-alleged-world-cup-pay-gap/


53 posted on 03/14/2020 3:02:59 PM PDT by MichaelRDanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

It’s not a matter of ability it’s a matter of revenue.

Women are 51% of thr buying public, want to make more money as a woman athlete get them to buy tickets to watch you play and stop bitching and blaming men.


54 posted on 03/14/2020 3:06:18 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson