Ah yes. The diverse party of inclusion. Unless you're NOT the one they want. So, is it anti-Samoan? Anti-hindu? Or another case of no girls allowed. IF they contestants really cared about those they 'claim' to care so much about, surely one of them would have stepped aside so a POC could be in the final number. Right? Guess not.
1 posted on
03/07/2020 11:59:04 AM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
Someone needs to ask Nancy Pelosi if she supports this misogynistic action of the Democrat Party.
2 posted on
03/07/2020 12:01:00 PM PST by
Sertorius
(A hayseed with no Greek and dam^ proud of it)
To: rktman
Interesting.....Democrats treat their own as bad as they treat the opposition if it’s expedient.
To: rktman
The Dems change the rules and make them up as they go.
4 posted on
03/07/2020 12:03:43 PM PST by
Signalman
To: rktman; LS; SunkenCiv
How was she eligible before? (Obviously not “total percent” of voters, or total delegates since she still has fewer than 4% in the “official” polls.)
Perhaps “still in the race and less than six/five/four candidates”?
5 posted on
03/07/2020 12:04:51 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but ABCNNBCBS donates every hour, every night, every day of the year.)
To: rktman
That’s very sexist of the democrat party. Besides, Tulsi may be a crazy lib, but her looks are the only reason for men to tune into the debate.
6 posted on
03/07/2020 12:05:30 PM PST by
EvilCapitalist
(Pets are no substitute for children.)
To: rktman
Like Roller Ball....No Rules...No Time Limit
8 posted on
03/07/2020 12:07:26 PM PST by
Roccus
(Prima di ogni altra cosa, siate armati!)
To: rktman
Is the DNC using Taliban/Isis rules...say one thing, mean another.
9 posted on
03/07/2020 12:07:54 PM PST by
ryderann
To: rktman
DNC’s two new rules:
Rule #1: If we don’t like you, you’re out.
Rule #2: Refer to Rule #1.
11 posted on
03/07/2020 12:08:31 PM PST by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: rktman
The fraud party changes their fraudulent rules whenever it suits them.
12 posted on
03/07/2020 12:08:43 PM PST by
Bullish
(Covfefe Happens)
To: rktman; All
Her politics suck, but she is the only one with a brain and competent speaking skills. Gabbard would totally destroy Biden to the point that he would pee his pants.
15 posted on
03/07/2020 12:13:11 PM PST by
Cobra64
(Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
To: rktman
19 posted on
03/07/2020 12:21:43 PM PST by
PGalt
(Past Peak Civilization?)
To: rktman
What else does one need to know about the democrats? And we’re hoping for an honest and fair election in 2020? Hah! The dems will see to it that that never happens.
To: rktman
If the Republican party was smart they would run ads saying the DemocRAT party is biased against women.
22 posted on
03/07/2020 12:35:12 PM PST by
Brooklyn Attitude
(It's no coincidence that the DemocRAT/media complex always sides with America's enemies.)
To: rktman
They only want the two white guys. No room for any women let alone a brown one. This is the good ole boys club.
25 posted on
03/07/2020 12:46:09 PM PST by
sanjuanbob
(Yes, I CAN take a joke /s)
To: rktman
So where are all the feminazis?
{{{crickets}}}
26 posted on
03/07/2020 1:03:07 PM PST by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
To: rktman
27 posted on
03/07/2020 1:08:04 PM PST by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: rktman
![See the source image](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-QN5M2Nx1zgI/TlxPqAnH-MI/AAAAAAAAIR8/KXoOAfsu218/s1600/stinking+badges.jpg)
Rules. We don't need no steenkin rules
28 posted on
03/07/2020 1:35:20 PM PST by
mjp
((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
To: rktman
No problem, she is a stealth Socialist.
She bats her eyes and a lot of Conservative Men think she would be an acceptable Rat POTUS.
They apparently suffer from LHS, Little Head Syndrome.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson