Skip to comments.
ICE defies sanctuary law to arrest illegal immigrant at San Francisco courthouse
The Washington Times ^
| Friday, March 6, 2020
| Stephen Dinan
Posted on 03/06/2020 9:57:00 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Excellent.
SF can do nothing about it.
Keep it up.
21
posted on
03/06/2020 11:03:48 AM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: MissNomer
“Thats a head-spinning headline. Its as if ICE is the one defying the law.”
That’s a good point.
22
posted on
03/06/2020 11:04:19 AM PST
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Maybe the feds need to start arresting the politicians across this country who have put sanctuary laws in place.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The feds can just ignore California’s laws and swoop in to arrest any illegal alien anywhere. The Constitution makes it quite clear that controlling the borders and setting immigration law is the purview of the feds.
24
posted on
03/06/2020 11:16:26 AM PST
by
FLT-bird
To: E. Pluribus Unum
...as he was about to enter the courthouse...Sounds like a good bust to me.
He wasn't in the courthouse so what is the beef?
25
posted on
03/06/2020 11:22:51 AM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: old-ager
The fault with this scenario is that the ATF wont be brought in to enforce state law.
ICE is merely following federal law which supersedes local and state law.
26
posted on
03/06/2020 11:24:57 AM PST
by
PittsburghAfterDark
(There is no one more racist than a white liberal.)
To: Grampa Dave
Correct, those are not laws.
27
posted on
03/06/2020 11:25:08 AM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: NorseViking
SF has homeless people, in public, reaching into their pants and eating their own excrement.
Their libtard normalcy bias blonds them to the fact they are actively destroying their own city/society.
28
posted on
03/06/2020 11:26:57 AM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Secret Agent Man
Correct, those are not laws.
In California, the city councils or county managers decide to make their city or county a sanctuary.
We never get to vote or even have a hearing before their edicts to become a sanctuary.
29
posted on
03/06/2020 11:33:27 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(Our president is now serving Democrats their hemlock tea, they ordered up with a smile!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I think ICE should step up their game and start arresting them in the Court Room in front of the Judge and Bailiff.
30
posted on
03/06/2020 11:35:24 AM PST
by
eyeamok
To: NorseViking
No, you have it backward. The Civil War was fought over the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which subordinates the states to federal law.
31
posted on
03/06/2020 11:37:53 AM PST
by
PUGACHEV
(Pires)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Great. Arrest the bad guys and then cut off the funds to these cities.
Sooner or later the local demonRAT polls will get the message.
32
posted on
03/06/2020 11:38:40 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(NUKE THE MOOSELIMB, TERRORISTS, NOW!)
To: old-ager
Theres nothing in our Bill of Rights, guaranteeing the natural & inalienable Rights of foreign nationals to break into our country and rape, rob & murder citizens.
33
posted on
03/06/2020 11:40:58 AM PST
by
NativeSon
( What Would Virginia Do? #WWVD)
To: Grampa Dave
Resolutions are not actual laws. They are statements on an issue or event or person.
34
posted on
03/06/2020 11:41:47 AM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: JBW1949
FREE SH*T! and the promise of more.
Same reason blacks have been voting for the dems.
35
posted on
03/06/2020 11:43:17 AM PST
by
NativeSon
( What Would Virginia Do? #WWVD)
To: old-ager
Not a fair comparison.
The 2nd Amendment is Constitutional law. Sanctuary is not.
36
posted on
03/06/2020 11:53:22 AM PST
by
Fireone
(Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
37
posted on
03/06/2020 12:00:29 PM PST
by
Jane Austen
(Neo-cons are liberal Democrats who love illegal aliens and war.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Federal law trumps state law.Pun absolutely intended.
38
posted on
03/06/2020 12:06:21 PM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(The Rats Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s an election year, which means there is pressure on ICE to up its arrest numbers. If you don’t believe me look at the arrest/deportation numbers during presidential election years. Obama included.
39
posted on
03/06/2020 12:08:42 PM PST
by
thefactor
(yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
To: old-ager
“Replace immigration sanctuary with Second Amendment sanctuary.”
Big difference.
Immigration sanctuary is protecting criminal alien invaders.
Second amendment sanctuary is protecting a civil right named in the Constitution.
40
posted on
03/06/2020 3:18:03 PM PST
by
sergeantdave
(Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson