Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
She was never a serious candidate. A complete media creation who never had a significant base of support.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
3 posted on
03/05/2020 11:10:45 AM PST by
vigilante2
(Make liberals cry again)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
She should have claimed she was Chinese too, then we could call her Faux-Mein.
4 posted on
03/05/2020 11:11:03 AM PST by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why didn't Elizabeth Warren do better?
Because most Americans can spot a liar and a grifter when they see one?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Misogyny is the only possible explanation.
Just ask her, or Hillary. They’ll tell ya.
And there ought to be a law against it lol
8 posted on
03/05/2020 11:12:29 AM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Her presidential campaign ended the moment she made her DNA test results public.
9 posted on
03/05/2020 11:12:46 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
It's almost impossible to know, but it's equally impossible to think it had no role in how voters perceived her. Impossible to confirm, impossible to deny. How convenient.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
It’s obvious the Democrat party is racist/sexist, they could only go with old white men.
She is the annoying, loud mouth, judgemental co-worker who thinks she is beloved and respected but in reality is held in contempt, loathed and people try and not have contact with her unless absolutely necessary.
11 posted on
03/05/2020 11:13:06 AM PST by
sarge83
To: Oldeconomybuyer
12 posted on
03/05/2020 11:13:23 AM PST by
rrrod
(6)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
How did she do as well as she did?
As my redneck biker friend said:
“No tits, no glory.”
13 posted on
03/05/2020 11:13:36 AM PST by
SaxxonWoods
(Epstein pulled a Carradine, the bozo.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Because dems are misogynistic, duh!
14 posted on
03/05/2020 11:13:51 AM PST by
subterfuge
(RIP T.P.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Because, they are all losers and she’s just a foreshadowing of what Nov holds for dems.
15 posted on
03/05/2020 11:14:07 AM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
My 90 year old mom said she was beginning to think Warren would take off like a buzzard one of these days the way she flapped her arms around in the air.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“Why wasn’t I 50 points ahead?”
To: Oldeconomybuyer
A nothingburger. No there there.
18 posted on
03/05/2020 11:15:13 AM PST by
John W
(Trump/Pence 2020)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
She repulses in all ways possible.
19 posted on
03/05/2020 11:15:33 AM PST by
Manic_Episode
(Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
America’s ex-wife’s shrill sister.
21 posted on
03/05/2020 11:15:36 AM PST by
Spruce
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“Why didn’t Elizabeth Warren do better?”
Because dimocrat voters are sexist.
Thankfully we will never have to know how many little jackets and sweaters of different colors she has to go with that one black shirt and pants she owns.
23 posted on
03/05/2020 11:16:00 AM PST by
MagnoliaB
( You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you will find you get what you need.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Was that a parody from Saturday Night Live? If so, I’m surprised the guy who wrote the skit did not get the third degree for writing while sexist.
27 posted on
03/05/2020 11:16:57 AM PST by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
28 posted on
03/05/2020 11:17:33 AM PST by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
