Police Demanding Citizens Allow Homeless To Camp On Their Private Property

Twitter ^ | 02/29/20

[Buffalo Head]

While I understand and feel the same sentiments as the bulk of input on this thread, just remember, they know where the "hosts" live and can do monumental damage to their homes.

Same with telemarketing calls. They know your phone number but you don't know theirs. Anything other than not answering, kind words or just hanging up can result in many middle-of-the-night harassing's phone calls from Pakistan or wherever.

At this time, unfortunately, there is not an effective defense or offence against these scum.

[Hulka]

Taking clause in the constitution, anyone?

“Police are now demanding citizens allow homeless people to camp on their private property”

Next logical step: “Police are now demanding citizens allow homeless people to live in their home because your home is private property. . .

[smvoice]

Opera music
Lots and lots of opera. 24/7.

And “McArthur’s Park.” {{shiver}}

[truthkeeper]

Dr. Zhivago. Scene at Yuri’s house.

[FLT-bird]

Unless the bums start camping on their property.

[PeterPrinciple]

https://www.policeforum.org/assets/PoliceResponsetoHomelessness.pdf

---

Be sure to read the conclusions beginning on page 78.

Few will read it but post your response.

[HombreSecreto]

Or any song by Alvin and the Chipmunks.

[NormsRevenge]

Welcome to the lawless sanctuary state, it’s just like the olden days, the golden days of glitter and glitz... now reduced to a pile of rubble when it comes to property rights.

[duckman]

“what about air horns?”
Even better, 24/7 loud, the ‘Barney’ song.

[Clemenza]

For most of the 19th Century, the homeless of New York City slept in the city jails. Commissioner Theodore Roosevelt put a stop to that. Then some entrepreneurs found that taking a run down building and separating “rooms” with chicken wire would be a way to make a few bucks off these destitute folks, so the flophouses were born, which lasted until the 1960s/70s when the real estate developers and quality of life activists had them town down.

[metmom]

No way.

It’s private property and the guy would be gone before he knew what hit him.

[HombreSecreto]

Wow. Much easier just to enforce vagrancy laws.

[Bob434]

[[Police are now demanding citizens allow homeless people to camp on their private property,]]

Well then hte landowners can not pay their taxes since the town thinks the land is theirs- the town can pay the taxes-

[Candor7]

I would be feeding my British mastiffs far less. They would have to get some of their dietary flesh from whatever trespasses. I know they think that both cops and the homeless taste good to them.

[PGalt]

Thanks, Clemenza. I did not know that. INFOBUMP

[Alberta's Child]

People posting on this thread are taking the wrong approach. Forget about dealing with the homeless mutant camped on your property. If you live in a place where the police tell you to let homeless people camp on your property, then the homeless mutant isn’t the problem — the police are. In fact, your entire municipal government is a threat to your life and liberty ... and should be treated accordingly.

So your strategy should be to get the hell out of there without going through the trouble of selling your home — because the homeless encampment on your front lawn is probably going to force you to sell at a steep discount.

With all this in mind, I would say the BEST approach is to burn your house to the ground — in a way that makes it look like your unwanted visitor was the cause of the fire. If everything works out well, he might even be immolated in his own “arson job.”

[CottonBall]

Is this satire?

[xp38]

All the music suggested so far has the potential of being liked by the interlopers. One needs industrial grade Yoko Ono for a sure solution.

[GOPJ]

It’s time to sue the city...

[PeterPrinciple]

https://time.com/4199924/vagrancy-law-history/

An interesting history of vagrancy.