Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Rules Chicago Can’t Ban Christian Students From Evangelizing
The Daily Signal ^ | 02/25/2020 | Tony Perkins

Posted on 02/25/2020 10:53:21 AM PST by aimhigh

When people ask Jeremy Chong about his Friday night plans, they don’t get the typical college sophomore response. He and his friends usually head to downtown Chicago. But the point isn’t to party—it’s to evangelize. And thanks to a federal judge, the group of Wheaton students can finally resume that without harassment.

For months, students like Chong and Matthew Swart would pass out gospel tracts at Millennium Park. They were just simple threefold pamphlets telling people about faith in Jesus Christ. “[We were] passing those out to anyone who would take [them] and having conversations when we were approached.”

Simple enough, right? Wrong. The park’s security team saw what was happening and stopped them—not once, but again and again. By the fifth time, the students had enough.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 7thcircuit; chicago; christian; evangelize; johnrobertblakey; judiciary; ndillinois; obamajudge; politicaljudiciary; seventhcircuit
They connected with a religious freedom law firm called Mauck & Baker and started knocking on the doors of park management. “We went back and forth with the city for a while, asking them to change their rules,” Swart explained.

Well, they changed their rules all right. They decided, in an absurd new policy, to divide the park into 11 imaginary rooms. And—give Chicago points for creativity—only one of those “rooms” allowed open conversations about faith. “It’s a public park!” Swart’s attorney John Mauck said incredulously. ” … Not rooms.”

1 posted on 02/25/2020 10:53:21 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

How is “Evangelizing” defined?

If I stand at a Chicago street corner and give out a Christian tract for free, is that “Evangelizing”? And why for First Amendment’s sake is that considered illegal?


2 posted on 02/25/2020 10:56:07 AM PST by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

If they can’t stop them legally, they’ll start shooting at them.


3 posted on 02/25/2020 10:56:33 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

I knew it! See, Trump is turning America into The Handmaid’s Tale - he’s such a Nazi. Damn him!


4 posted on 02/25/2020 11:01:03 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("You'll never hear surf music again".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

The fact that this even needed to go to court is amazing to me....


5 posted on 02/25/2020 11:03:06 AM PST by qwerty1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because it might hurt the feelings of somebody. Sad but that is what it amounts to in those who oppose such speech.


6 posted on 02/25/2020 11:05:25 AM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
“If somebody believes that the Willis Tower is going to collapse in an hour

Someone actually calls the Sears Tower "Willis Tower"? Dang.
7 posted on 02/25/2020 11:07:06 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

I’ve seen his facebook page and read many of the comments he has received. Jeremy Chong and his friends have set themselves up for a lot of abuse by even mentioning Christ in downtown Chicago.

I admire his faith and bravery.


8 posted on 02/25/2020 11:10:06 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

We were supposed to become the handmaid’s tale world, if Brett Kavanaugh were to become a Supreme Court justice.

Funny how things work out. Kavanaugh became a justice on the court, hut America has not become the world of the handmaid’s tale. Somehow their predictions didn’t come true.


9 posted on 02/25/2020 11:10:20 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How is “Evangelizing” defined?

If I stand at a Chicago street corner and give out a Christian tract for free, is that “Evangelizing”? And why for First Amendment’s sake is that considered illegal?
= = =

As Christ changes me into His image, people see that.

And I will stand out, despite my acting ‘normal’.

So . . . we are exposed, and ‘identified’ for illegal evangelizing (persecution).


10 posted on 02/25/2020 11:13:24 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Bump


11 posted on 02/25/2020 11:17:10 AM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

I wonder if park security would similarly harass people passing out tracts about transgender rights?


12 posted on 02/25/2020 11:24:00 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
Trump . . .he’s such a Nazi.

"Look at that little Nazi run!"


13 posted on 02/25/2020 11:27:41 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (BLACK LIVES MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

I don’t think it’s good enough that they won their case, there should be Sanctions on the City Council that undertook this Malicious Act in their relentless attack on the First Amendment of the US Constitution, at the very least they should be personally liable for all costs and legal fees


14 posted on 02/25/2020 12:01:11 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok; All

That’s not the only thing they should be looking at
COULD THIS BE WHY CHICAGOANS ARE SEEING RATS ?
The city of Chicago is composed of 50 wards which average out to around 72 precincts of about 350 or more voters in each precinct. Many are former villages incorporated into the city as the city grew. . A Chicago Alderman is in effect a mini mayor. They have input into who gets city services and now it’s how those services are being administered seem to be running into who’s ward is it ?.

What’s not being looked at is how Chicago wards have been redistricted. Chicago has had neighborhoods divided to create “Hispanic”residential sections going to Hispanic aldermanic and congressional (Gutierez) candidates and blacks going to black candidates.Which apparently is the result of the turnover in the Freddie and Fanny mortgage collapse. As stable integrated areas changed into being unstable because of constant dwelling turnover.had the effect of breaking up a contiguous geographic continuity and community identity.

Because the wards affected which are really like small towns have had sections broken up into areas where if a problem arises in a given section of street which has one way traffic only. It may be two way a block down because it’s in a different ward.

The same applies to all other city services including zoning where serving socialist ideologic political purposes single dwelling units are removed and replaced by multiple high rise apartments complcating city services such as sanitation where garbage collection routes are organized by ward boundaries. Which disrupts living style where that is permitted to happen. But in doing so those alderman have people who will vote for them because they know no better,

50 year Alderman Burke who is under federal charges for corruption ward is an example. Burke’s ward ,14th, needed remapping . The 14th was originally known as “Back of The Yards” Once the home of the famous Chicago Stock Yards where most food processors along with employee demographics have since relocated. It was a compact area almost 15 plus city blocks square area composed mostly of single and 2 story frame and brick family dwellings mixed with scattered brick apartment units. Because of the construction, insurance rates varied and became known as the condemned as “redlining”.

When the democrats also warily supported by the Bush 2 administration came up with the no 20% down mortgage removed. Areas in the ward dramatically changed in demographics. Many of those dwellings sold under those conditions went into disrepair or default.


15 posted on 02/25/2020 12:16:35 PM PST by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin posting here for the record hoping somebody might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson