Translation: "Waaaahhhh, if only Hillary had been elected we wouldn't have to put up with these Constitutionalist Justices and could continue remaking America into a leftist Utopia."
1 posted on
02/23/2020 8:11:13 AM PST by
PROCON
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: PROCON
Classic liberal projection as usual.
70 posted on
02/23/2020 9:29:32 AM PST by
headstamp 2
(There's a stairway to heaven, but there's also a highway to hell.)
To: PROCON
How does that shoe on the other foot feel biotch?
71 posted on
02/23/2020 9:33:08 AM PST by
eartick
(Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
To: PROCON
Trump administration’s expansion of situations where the government can deny visas to non-citizens.
Logic and law in one statement love it.
73 posted on
02/23/2020 9:52:46 AM PST by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
To: PROCON
While there isn’t much difference between the GOPe and the Democrats, this is the big area where there is a difference, even Mitt or McCain would have never nominated someone like Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.
74 posted on
02/23/2020 9:55:03 AM PST by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: PROCON
Looks like Sista Sonia is Down for the Struggle!
75 posted on
02/23/2020 10:06:34 AM PST by
BwanaNdege
( Experience is the best teacher, but if you can accept it 2nd hand, the tuition is less!)
To: PROCON
77 posted on
02/23/2020 10:18:55 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: PROCON
Sotomayer lies, and she knows it.
She knows the learned justices she disagrees with are not doing political favors for Trump. They quite rightly and simply have a Constitutional view that differs from hers and that view, unlike hers, does not find Constitutional fault with the policies and executive orders that she wants the justices to disallow.
She shows her very tenure was and is for the favoring of a political bias and not the Constitution and for that she never should have been granted a seat on our highest court.
78 posted on
02/23/2020 10:36:50 AM PST by
Wuli
To: PROCON
Its the CONSTITUTION. You know, that archaic document you and your pals are trying to trash.
79 posted on
02/23/2020 10:37:44 AM PST by
Dick Bachert
(THE DEEP STATE HATES YOU!)
To: PROCON
Sotomayor issues blistering dissent, says Republican-appointed justices have bias toward Trump administrationFederal law already says that officials can take into account whether an applicant is likely to become a "public charge," which government guidance has said refers to someone "primarily dependent on the government for subsistence.”
In the past, non-cash benefits such as forms of Medicaid and certain housing assistance did not count.
Huh??? Of course they counted, in the rule...That's what a 'public charge' is...It's just that no one enforced the rule...
It's a shame the Communists in the SC are now going main stream media political...The 'decision' has nothing to do with Trump...It's about upholding the rule of law (that already exists)...
80 posted on
02/23/2020 11:07:57 AM PST by
Iscool
To: PROCON
Don’t like it? Quit.
Hahahahahahahaha!
82 posted on
02/23/2020 12:06:02 PM PST by
Albion Wilde
(Party that freed sIaves, passed Civil Rights is called racist by the party that started the KKK.)
To: PROCON
Wait, according to RobertsIdiot, there is no bias among judges...../s
83 posted on
02/23/2020 12:21:53 PM PST by
cranked
To: PROCON
Sotomayor issues blistering dissent, says Republican-appointed justices have bias toward Trump administration
No KIDDING??
Whoda thought?
85 posted on
02/24/2020 5:07:36 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson