To: SeekAndFind
Previously the government defined "public charge" as anyone receiving cash benefits. Those getting food stamps or housing assistance were exempt. How could anyone justify the difference? In all cases the person was getting public (i.e. taxpayer) support.
2 posted on
02/22/2020 8:57:33 PM PST by
Cowboy Bob
(Mocking Liberals is not only a right, but the duty of all Americans.)
To: SeekAndFind
The wise Latina is sad but we need a stable and free country to live in. Sorry Sotomayor):
3 posted on
02/22/2020 9:01:51 PM PST by
Crucial
To: SeekAndFind
Goody, does this mean we can deport the BroFo from Somalia, MN?
4 posted on
02/22/2020 9:07:05 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: SeekAndFind
Next step: Back charge the "charitable organizations" responsible for funneling them into the country. Ka-ching.
Bankruptcy. It's not just for right-of-center institutions anymore...
5 posted on
02/22/2020 9:08:19 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
Duh, it’s the law. Oh wait, I forgot the “law” is only selectively enforced.
8 posted on
02/22/2020 10:12:44 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Q babbleAnon folks are weird.)
To: SeekAndFind
Welfare is welfare. It’s ALL taxpayer money in one way or another. I don’t want any of it going to parasites legal or illegal.
9 posted on
02/22/2020 10:21:35 PM PST by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...
10 posted on
02/22/2020 10:41:53 PM PST by
bitt
(new q posts)
To: SeekAndFind
...they wouldn't have to seek "unprecedented" numbers of emergency orders. And they would not have to do that so much if there were not an unprecedented number of nationwide injunctions.
11 posted on
02/22/2020 10:47:35 PM PST by
Fury
To: SeekAndFind
12 posted on
02/22/2020 11:31:39 PM PST by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
To: SeekAndFind
The immigration law has said “no dependency” since 1884. And if you’re ill, don’t even think of it.
To: SeekAndFind
My immigrant wife, perfect case for a visa, had to sign a “won’t be a public charge” pledge. What changed?
16 posted on
02/23/2020 5:28:34 AM PST by
ctdonath2
(Democrats oppose democracy.)
To: SeekAndFind
17 posted on
02/23/2020 6:50:25 AM PST by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
To: SeekAndFind
I don’t think this a new requirement but rather a return to the way it was up until the early seventies. Green cards were difficult to come by. You could only apply for them in your home country and the process would take 18 months or more. Thorough vetting of financial condition criminals records, morals, and more were part of the approval routine.
18 posted on
02/23/2020 7:00:48 AM PST by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: SeekAndFind
Take care of the poor within your own gates first.
19 posted on
02/23/2020 11:04:57 AM PST by
tbw2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
